Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Development of Unilineal Descent

Ember, Carol R., Ember, Melvin, Pasternak, Burton·1974·Journal of Anthropological Research

Abstract

This paper describes the reasoning and results of cross-cultural research on the conditions that may lead to the emergence of unilineal descent and some of the major variations thereof. We suggest that the presence of warfare in conjunction with a unilocal pattern of residence may be the impetus for the formation of unilineal descent groups, and that the kind of warfare which is present together with demographic factors may determine the particular kinds of unilineal descent groups which develop. The major variations of unilineal descent systems we deal with include contiguous versus dispersed descent groups, demonstrated descent groups (lineages) versus putative descent groups (clans, etc.), and dual (moiety) organization versus other kinds of putative descent systems. Finally, we present and discuss evidence suggesting that a system of putative descent groups (a "clan" system) generally develops before a system of demonstrated descent groups (a "lineage" system).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/jar.30.2.3629640

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ember, C. R., Ember, M., & Pasternak, B.
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Research
Published
1974-07
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
69-94
ISSN
  • 0091-7710
  • 2153-3806
Cited by
36
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review