The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Institutional repositories and scholarly publishing
Abstract
The institutional repository (IR), an open Web‐based archive of scholarly material produced by the members of a defined institution, has come to the fore following the launch of DSpace at MIT at the end of 2002. Here we review recent developments in IRs and explore the impact their expansion may have on scholarly publishing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These concerns and the near empty state of most archives once they are set up are by no means unique to IISc.”
From Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries (2005) · cites this paper as Ware 2004
In the citing paper
“Indeed a recent survey of 45 institutional archives reveals an average of only 290 records per institution (Ware 2004).”
From Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries (2005) · cites this paper as Ware 2004
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories
Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (2005) · D-Lib Magazine · doi:10.1045/january2005-foster · Cited by 326
Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. (2007) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 209
Chan, L., & Costa, S. (2005) · New Library World · doi:10.1108/03074800510587354 · Cited by 165
“Indeed a recent survey of 45 institutional archives reveals an average of only 290 records per institution (Ware, 2004).”
BackgroundChan, L. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2004v29n3a1455 · Cited by 167
Assessment of Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories: Depositorship and Full-Text Availability
Xia, J., & Sun, L. (2007) · Serials Review · doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2006.12.003 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Ware, M.
- Corresponding author
- Ware, Mark
- ORCID
- Ware, Mark
- Venue
- Learned Publishing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4857
- OpenAlex
- W2009958682
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 66.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- PALS
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- institutional repositories, scholarly publishing, DSpace, open access, digital archives, scholarly communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
