The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Authors and open access publishing
Abstract
Surveys were carried out to learn more about authors and open access publishing. Awareness of open access journals among those who had not published in them was quite high; awareness of ‘self‐archiving’ was less. For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact. Authors who had not published in an open access journal attributed that to unfamiliarity with such journals. Forty per cent of authors have self‐archived their traditional journal articles and almost twice as many say they would do so if required to.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Experience in the UK suggests that authors are more likely to self-archive their publications in their institutional repositories if their institutions require them to do so (Swan and Brown 2004).”
From Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries (2005) · cites this paper as Swan and Brown 2004
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–218 of 218
Content analysis and Opinion mining of Tweets about Open Access and its Main Features
Saber, Z., Sotudeh, H., Yousefi, Z., Khunjush, F., & Aloni, F. G. (2021) · پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات · doi:10.52547/jipm.37.1.305
S. Sistematização do fluxo de informação tecnológica no atendimento ao cliente da Embrapa hortaliças
Parmagnani, R., & Costa, S. M. D. S. (2018) · doi:10.18225/9788570131485.cap10
Comunicação informal e socialização do conhecimento em instituições financeiras
Cruz, A., & Costa, S. M. D. S. (2018) · doi:10.18225/9788570131485.cap16
(2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-84334-593-0.50013-7
Tavares, R. B., Costa, S. M. D. S., & Hepworth, M. E. (2018) · doi:10.18225/9788570131485.cap08
Gestão do conhecimento estratégico: metodologia e aplicações
Miranda, R., & Costa, S. M. D. S. (2018) · doi:10.18225/9788570131485.cap112
(2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-84334-138-3.50024-3
Manuscript Online Repository as Scholar References Source
Maknun, M. L., & Noviani, N. L. (2023) · The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences · doi:10.15642/sarpass.2023.2.2.161-179
Alonso-Álvarez, P., Sastrón-Toledo, P., & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2024) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/98j5p
Farhadi, B. (2024) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47411-8_32-1
Farhadi, B. (2025) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76485-1_32
Thorsson, A., & Zhou, X. H. D. (2008) · Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås)
Deja, M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8909707/v1
Schöld, J. (2007) · Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås)
Colombo, F. (2008) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)
Metadata
- Authors
- Swan, A., & Brown, S.
- Affiliations
- Key Perspectives Ltd
- Corresponding author
- Swan, Alma
- Brown, Sheridan
- Venue
- Learned Publishing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-224
- ISSN
- 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4857
- OpenAlex
- W1969232170
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 90.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- CogPrints (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- open access publishing, author awareness, self-archiving, open access journals, research impact, research funding, author attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
