The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ROTATIONAL AND RADIAL VELOCITIES FOR A SAMPLE OF 761 HIPPARCOS GIANTS AND THE ROLE OF BINARITY
Open accessAbstract
We present rotational and radial velocities for a sample of 761 giants selected from the Hipparcos Catalogue to lie within 100 pc of the Sun. Our original goal was to examine stellar rotation in field giants using spectroscopic line broadening to look for evidence of excess rotation that could be attributed to planets that were engulfed as the parent stars expanded. Thus we were obliged to investigate other sources of line broadening, including tidal coupling in close binaries and macroturbulence. For all the binaries in our sample with periods shorter than 20 days the orbits have been circularized, while about half the orbits with periods in the range 20–100 days still show significant eccentricity. All our primaries in orbits shorter than 30 days show line broadening consistent with synchronized rotation, while about half the primaries with periods in the range 30–120 days are synchronized. To study the dependence of rotation on stellar evolution when tidal effects are not important, we used a subsample of single stars and members in wide binaries. We found evidence to suggest that the first dredge-up may play a role in speeding up the rotation of the observable outer layers of giants and that the rotational velocity of horizontal branch stars is larger by a few km s −1 than that of first-ascent giants with similar mass, effective temperature, and radius. Finally, we found three giants that rotate more rapidly than expected. We conjecture that they acquired their excess angular momentum by ingesting planets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S., Carpenter, J. M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., et al. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/498708 · Cited by 12,019
Cited by
TESTING A PREDICTIVE THEORETICAL MODEL FOR THE MASS LOSS RATES OF COOL STARS
Cranmer, S. R., & Saar, S. H. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/54 · Cited by 341
APOGEE Data Releases 13 and 14: Data and Analysis
Holtzman, J. A., Hasselquist, S., Shetrone, M., Cunha, K., Prieto, C. A., Anguiano, B., Bizyaev, D., Bovy, J., Casey, A., Edvardsson, B., et al. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad4f9 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Massarotti, A., Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., & Fogel, J.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-12-07
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-231
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2162606529
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROTATIONAL AND RADIAL VELOCITIES FOR A SAMPLE OF 761 HIPPARCOS GIANTS AND THE ROLE OF BINARITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/209
- The paper
- Massarotti, A., Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., & Fogel, J. (2008). ROTATIONAL AND RADIAL VELOCITIES FOR A SAMPLE OF 761 HIPPARCOS GIANTS AND THE ROLE OF BINARITY. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.