Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A DEFINITIVE SURVEY FOR LYMAN LIMIT SYSTEMS AT z ∼ 3.5 WITH THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY

Open access
Prochaska, J. Xavier, O'Meara, John M., Worseck, Gabor·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We perform a semi-automated survey for τ 912 ⩾ 2 Lyman limit systems (LLSs) in quasar spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Data Release 7. From a starting sample of 2473 quasars with z em = 3.6–5.0, we analyze 429 spectra meeting strict selection criteria for a total redshift path Δ z = 93.8 and identify 190 intervening systems at z LLS ⩾ 3.3. The incidence of τ 912 ⩾ 2 LLSs per unit redshift, ℓ τ⩾2(z), is well described by a single power law at these redshifts: , with z * ≡ 3.7, C LLS = 1.9 ± 0.2, and γ LLS = 5.1 ± 1.5 (68% c.l.). These values are systematically lower than previous estimates (especially at z < 4) but are consistent with recent measurements of the mean free path to ionizing radiation. Extrapolations of this power law to z = 0 are inconsistent with previous estimations of ℓ(z) at z < 1 and may indicate a break at z ≈ 2, similar to that observed for the Lyα forest. Our results also indicate that the systems giving rise to LLS absorption decrease by ≈50% in comoving number density and/or physical size from z = 4 to 3.3, perhaps due to an enhanced extragalactic ultraviolet background. The observations place an integral constraint on the H i frequency distribution f(N H i , X) and indicate that the power-law slope is likely shallower than β = −1 at . Including other constraints on f(N H i , X) from the literature, we infer that β is steeper than β = −1.7 at , implying at least two inflections in f(N H i , X). We also perform a survey for proximate LLSs (PLLSs) and find that ℓ PLLS(z) is systematically lower (≈25%) than intervening systems. Finally, we estimate that systematic effects impose an uncertainty of 10%–20% in the ℓ(z) measurements; these effects may limit the precision of all future surveys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/392

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Prochaska, J. X., O'Meara, J. M., & Worseck, G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
718
Issue
1
Pages
392-416
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2099603107
Cited by
164
References
1
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A DEFINITIVE SURVEY FOR LYMAN LIMIT SYSTEMS AT z ∼ 3.5 WITH THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/392
The paper
Prochaska, J. X., O'Meara, J. M., & Worseck, G. (2010). A DEFINITIVE SURVEY FOR LYMAN LIMIT SYSTEMS AT z ∼ 3.5 WITH THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/392

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.