The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A DEFINITIVE SURVEY FOR LYMAN LIMIT SYSTEMS AT z ∼ 3.5 WITH THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Open accessAbstract
We perform a semi-automated survey for τ 912 ⩾ 2 Lyman limit systems (LLSs) in quasar spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Data Release 7. From a starting sample of 2473 quasars with z em = 3.6–5.0, we analyze 429 spectra meeting strict selection criteria for a total redshift path Δ z = 93.8 and identify 190 intervening systems at z LLS ⩾ 3.3. The incidence of τ 912 ⩾ 2 LLSs per unit redshift, ℓ τ⩾2(z), is well described by a single power law at these redshifts: , with z * ≡ 3.7, C LLS = 1.9 ± 0.2, and γ LLS = 5.1 ± 1.5 (68% c.l.). These values are systematically lower than previous estimates (especially at z < 4) but are consistent with recent measurements of the mean free path to ionizing radiation. Extrapolations of this power law to z = 0 are inconsistent with previous estimations of ℓ(z) at z < 1 and may indicate a break at z ≈ 2, similar to that observed for the Lyα forest. Our results also indicate that the systems giving rise to LLS absorption decrease by ≈50% in comoving number density and/or physical size from z = 4 to 3.3, perhaps due to an enhanced extragalactic ultraviolet background. The observations place an integral constraint on the H i frequency distribution f(N H i , X) and indicate that the power-law slope is likely shallower than β = −1 at . Including other constraints on f(N H i , X) from the literature, we infer that β is steeper than β = −1.7 at , implying at least two inflections in f(N H i , X). We also perform a survey for proximate LLSs (PLLSs) and find that ℓ PLLS(z) is systematically lower (≈25%) than intervening systems. Finally, we estimate that systematic effects impose an uncertainty of 10%–20% in the ℓ(z) measurements; these effects may limit the precision of all future surveys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
Cited by
Properties of galaxies reproduced by a hydrodynamic simulation
Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., Springel, V., Torrey, P., Sijacki, D., Xu, D., Snyder, G., Bird, S., Nelson, D., & Hernquist, L. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13316 · Cited by 1,289
De re metallica: the cosmic chemical evolution of galaxies
Maiolino, R., & Mannucci, F. (2019) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 · Cited by 697
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Becker, G. D., & Bolton, J. S. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1610 · Cited by 321
Concordance models of reionization: implications for faint galaxies and escape fraction evolution
Kuhlen, M., & Faucher-Giguère, C.-A. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20924.x · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Prochaska, J. X., O'Meara, J. M., & Worseck, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-06-30
- Volume
- 718
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 392-416
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2099603107
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A DEFINITIVE SURVEY FOR LYMAN LIMIT SYSTEMS AT z ∼ 3.5 WITH THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/392
- The paper
- Prochaska, J. X., O'Meara, J. M., & Worseck, G. (2010). A DEFINITIVE SURVEY FOR LYMAN LIMIT SYSTEMS AT z ∼ 3.5 WITH THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.