The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MAGNETIC FIELDS IN INTERSTELLAR CLOUDS FROM ZEEMAN OBSERVATIONS: INFERENCE OF TOTAL FIELD STRENGTHS BY BAYESIAN ANALYSIS
Open accessAbstract
The only direct measurements of interstellar magnetic field strengths depend on the Zeeman effect, which samples the line-of-sight component B z of the magnetic vector. In this paper, we use a Bayesian approach to analyze the observed probability density function (PDF) of B z from Zeeman surveys of H i , OH, and CN spectral lines in order to infer a density-dependent stochastic model of the total field strength B in diffuse and molecular clouds. We find that at n < 300 cm −3 (in the diffuse interstellar medium sampled by H i lines), B does not scale with density. This suggests that diffuse clouds are assembled by flows along magnetic field lines, which would increase the density but not the magnetic field strength. We further find strong evidence for B in molecular clouds being randomly distributed between very small values and a maximum that scales with volume density n as B ∝ n 0.65 for n >300 cm −3 , with an uncertainty at the 50% level in the power-law exponent of about ±0.05. This break-point density could be interpreted as the average density at which parsec-scale clouds become self-gravitating. Both the uniform PDF of total field strengths and the scaling with density suggest that magnetic fields in molecular clouds are often too weak to dominate the star formation process. The stochasticity of the total field strength B implies that many fields are so weak that the mass/flux ratio in many clouds must be significantly supercritical. A two-thirds power law comes from isotropic contraction of gas too weakly magnetized for the magnetic field to affect the morphology of the collapse. On the other hand, our study does not rule out some clouds having strong magnetic fields with critical mass/flux ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Probability theory the logic of science
Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. L. (2003) · Cited by 4,575
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science
Jaynes, E. T. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790423 · Cited by 4,045
Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence
Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.125 · Cited by 1,761
Neutral Atomic Phases of the Interstellar Medium in the Galaxy
Wolfire, M. G., McKee, C. F., Hollenbach, D., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/368016 · Cited by 1,125
Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds: Observations Confront Theory
Crutcher, R. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307483 · Cited by 915
Self-citationStar Formation in a Crossing Time
Elmegreen, B. G. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308361 · Cited by 563
Star Formation in a Crossing TimePreprint
Elmegreen, B. G. (1999) · Cited by 359
Heiles, C., & Troland, T. H. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428896 · Cited by 277
Self-citationJenkins, E. B., & Tripp, T. M. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/323326 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“While there are still controversies, the data indicate that most clouds (or, more precisely, the parts of clouds with Zeeman measurements) are supercritical or close to critical, but not strongly subcritical (Crutcher et al. 2010).”
BackgroundON THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS
Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/51 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Crutcher, R. M., Wandelt, B., Heiles, C., Falgarone, E., & Troland, T. H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-11-19
- Volume
- 725
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 466-479
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1967039664
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MAGNETIC FIELDS IN INTERSTELLAR CLOUDS FROM ZEEMAN OBSERVATIONS: INFERENCE OF TOTAL FIELD STRENGTHS BY BAYESIAN ANALYSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/725/1/466
- The paper
- Crutcher, R. M., Wandelt, B., Heiles, C., Falgarone, E., & Troland, T. H. (2010). MAGNETIC FIELDS IN INTERSTELLAR CLOUDS FROM ZEEMAN OBSERVATIONS: INFERENCE OF TOTAL FIELD STRENGTHS BY BAYESIAN ANALYSIS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/725/1/466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.