The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ON THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS
Open accessAbstract
We study the star formation efficiency (SFE) in simulations and observations of turbulent, magnetized, molecular clouds. We find that the probability density functions (PDFs) of the density and the column density in our simulations with solenoidal, mixed, and compressive forcing of turbulence, sonic Mach numbers of 3–50, and magnetic fields in the super- to the trans-Alfvénic regime all develop power-law tails of flattening slope with increasing SFE. The high-density tails of the PDFs are consistent with equivalent radial density profiles, ρ∝ r −κ with κ ∼ 1.5–2.5, in agreement with observations. Studying velocity–size scalings, we find that all the simulations are consistent with the observed v ∝ℓ 1/2 scaling of supersonic turbulence and seem to approach Kolmogorov turbulence with v ∝ℓ 1/3 below the sonic scale. The velocity–size scaling is, however, largely independent of the SFE. In contrast, the density–size and column density–size scalings are highly sensitive to star formation. We find that the power-law slope α of the density power spectrum, P 3D (ρ, k )∝ k α , or equivalently the Δ-variance spectrum of the column density, σ 2 Δ (Σ, ℓ) ∝ ℓ −α , switches sign from α ≲ 0 for SFE ∼ 0 to α ≳ 0 when star formation proceeds (SFE > 0). We provide a relation to compute the SFE from a measurement of α. Studying the literature, we find values ranging from α = −1.6 to +1.6 in observations covering scales from the large-scale atomic medium, over cold molecular clouds, down to dense star-forming cores. From those α values, we infer SFEs and find good agreement with independent measurements based on young stellar object (YSO) counts, where available. Our SFE–α relation provides an independent estimate of the SFE based on the column density map of a cloud alone, without requiring a priori knowledge of star formation activity or YSO counts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A unified model for galactic discs: star formation, turbulence driving, and mass transport
Krumholz, M. R., Burkhart, B., Forbes, J. C., & Crocker, R. M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty852 · Cited by 319
WHAT DETERMINES THE DENSITY STRUCTURE OF MOLECULAR CLOUDS? A CASE STUDY OF ORION B WITH HERSCHEL
Schneider, N., André, P., Könyves, V., Bontemps, S., Motte, F., Federrath, C., Ward-Thompson, D., Arzoumanian, D., Benedettini, M., Bressert, E., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/l17 · Cited by 266
Self-citationA dynamical model for the formation of gas rings and episodic starbursts near galactic centres
Krumholz, M. R., & Kruijssen, J. M. D. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1670 · Cited by 142
A dynamical model for gas flows, star formation and nuclear winds in galactic centres
Krumholz, M. R., Kruijssen, J. M. D., & Crocker, R. M. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3195 · Cited by 111
Spilker, A., Kainulainen, J., & Orkisz, J. (2021) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040021 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-01-08
- Volume
- 763
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2016955049
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/51
- The paper
- Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. (2013). ON THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.