The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A NEW JEANS RESOLUTION CRITERION FOR (M)HD SIMULATIONS OF SELF-GRAVITATING GAS: APPLICATION TO MAGNETIC FIELD AMPLIFICATION BY GRAVITY-DRIVEN TURBULENCE
Open accessAbstract
Cosmic structure formation is characterized by the complex interplay between gravity, turbulence, and magnetic fields. The processes by which gravitational energy is converted into turbulent and magnetic energies, however, remain poorly understood. Here, we show with high-resolution, adaptive-mesh simulations that MHD turbulence is efficiently driven by extracting energy from the gravitational potential during the collapse of a dense gas cloud. Compressible motions generated during the contraction are converted into solenoidal, turbulent motions, leading to a natural energy ratio of E sol / E tot ≈ 2/3. We find that the energy injection scale of gravity-driven turbulence is close to the local Jeans scale. If small seeds of the magnetic field are present, they are amplified exponentially fast via the small-scale dynamo process. The magnetic field grows most efficiently on the smallest scales, for which the stretching, twisting, and folding of field lines, and the turbulent vortices are sufficiently resolved. We find that this scale corresponds to about 30 grid cells in the simulations. We thus suggest a new minimum resolution criterion of 30 cells per Jeans length in (magneto)hydrodynamical simulations of self-gravitating gas, in order to resolve turbulence on the Jeans scale, and to capture minimum dynamo amplification of the magnetic field. Due to numerical diffusion, however, any existing simulation today can at best provide lower limits on the physical growth rates. We conclude that a small, initial magnetic field can grow to dynamically important strength on timescales significantly shorter than the free-fall time of the cloud.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov
Frisch, U. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139170666 · Cited by 5,045
Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. (1991) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/170270 · Cited by 4,469
Hydromagnetic flows from accretion discs and the production of radio jets
Blandford, R. D., & Payne, D. G. (1982) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/199.4.883 · Cited by 4,102
Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds
Larson, R. B. (1981) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/194.4.809 · Cited by 2,592
A Mathematical Model Illustrating the Theory of Turbulence
Burgers, J. M. (1948) · Advances in Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2156(08)70100-5 · Cited by 2,573
FLASH: An Adaptive Mesh Hydrodynamics Code for Modeling Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes
Fryxell, B., Olson, K., Ricker, P., Timmes, F. X., Zingale, M., Lamb, D. Q., MacNeice, P., Rosner, R., Truran, J. W., & Tufo, H. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/317361 · Cited by 2,567
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 · Cited by 2,478
Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence
Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.125 · Cited by 1,761
Self-citationAstrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory
Brandenburg, A., & Subramanian, K. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.06.005 · Cited by 1,640
Mass, luminosity, and line width relations of Galactic molecular clouds
Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., & Yahil, A. (1987) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165493 · Cited by 1,611
Cited by
Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
ON THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS
Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/51 · Cited by 403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Federrath, C., Sur, S., Schleicher, D. R. G., Banerjee, R., & Klessen, R. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-03-23
- Volume
- 731
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2066802002
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A NEW JEANS RESOLUTION CRITERION FOR (M)HD SIMULATIONS OF SELF-GRAVITATING GAS: APPLICATION TO MAGNETIC FIELD AMPLIFICATION BY GRAVITY-DRIVEN TURBULENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/62
- The paper
- Federrath, C., Sur, S., Schleicher, D. R. G., Banerjee, R., & Klessen, R. S. (2011). A NEW JEANS RESOLUTION CRITERION FOR (M)HD SIMULATIONS OF SELF-GRAVITATING GAS: APPLICATION TO MAGNETIC FIELD AMPLIFICATION BY GRAVITY-DRIVEN TURBULENCE. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/62
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.