The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FORMATION AND STRUCTURE OF LOW-DENSITY EXO-NEPTUNES
Open accessAbstract
Kepler has found hundreds of Neptune-size (2–6 R ⊕ ) planet candidates within 0.5 AU of their stars. The nature of the vast majority of these planets is not known because their masses have not been measured. Using theoretical models of planet formation, evolution, and structure, we explore the range of minimum plausible masses for low-density exo-Neptunes. We focus on highly irradiated planets with T eq ⩾ 500 K. We consider two separate formation pathways for low-mass planets with voluminous atmospheres of light gases: core-nucleated accretion and outgassing of hydrogen from dissociated ices. We show that Neptune-size planets at T eq = 500 K with masses as small as a few times that of Earth can plausibly be formed by core-nucleated accretion coupled with subsequent inward migration. We also derive a limiting low-density mass–radius relation for rocky planets with outgassed hydrogen envelopes but no surface water. Rocky planets with outgassed hydrogen envelopes typically have computed radii well below 3 R ⊕ . For both planets with H/He envelopes from core-nucleated accretion and planets with outgassed hydrogen envelopes, we employ planet interior models to map the range of planet mass–envelope mass–equilibrium temperature parameter space that is consistent with Neptune-size planet radii. Atmospheric mass loss mediates which corners of this parameter space are populated by actual planets and ultimately governs the minimum plausible mass at a specified transit radius. We find that Kepler 's 2–6 R ⊕ planet candidates at T eq = 500–1000 K could potentially have masses ≲ 4 M ⊕ . Although our quantitative results depend on several assumptions, our qualitative finding that warm Neptune-size planets can have masses substantially smaller than those given by interpolating the masses and radii of planets within our Solar System is robust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. (1996) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 · Cited by 3,127
Self-citationApproximations to the radii of Roche lobes
Eggleton, P. P. (1983) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/160960 · Cited by 2,369
Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. (2003) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252 · Cited by 1,566
An Equation of State for Low-Mass Stars and Giant Planets
Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192204 · Cited by 1,274
Low-temperature Rosseland opacities
Alexander, D. R., & Ferguson, J. W. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/175039 · Cited by 1,161
Giant Planet Formation by Gravitational Instability
Boss, A. P. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5320.1836 · Cited by 1,124 · cited 1×
“This work does not consider planet formation via gravitational instability (Boss 1997) or tidal downsizing (Nayakshin 2010a,b, 2011).”
BackgroundRingwood, A. E. (1979) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6167-4 · Cited by 1,050
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/512120 · Cited by 1,002
Chemical analyses of meteorites: A compilation of stony and iron meteorite analyses
Jarosewich, E. (1990) · Meteoritics · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00717.x · Cited by 962
An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics
Carroll, B. W., & Ostlie, D. A. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108380980 · Cited by 929
Cited by
UNDERSTANDING THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR SUB-NEPTUNES: RADIUS AS A PROXY FOR COMPOSITION
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/1 · Cited by 722
Kepler-36: A Pair of Planets with Neighboring Orbits and Dissimilar Densities
Carter, J. A., Agol, E., Chaplin, W. J., Basu, S., Bedding, T. R., Buchhave, L. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Deck, K. M., Elsworth, Y., Fabrycky, D. C., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223269 · Cited by 389
Self-citationDearth of short-period Neptunian exoplanets: A desert in period-mass and period-radius planes
Mazeh, T., Holczer, T., & Faigler, S. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528065 · Cited by 355
Perryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
MAKE SUPER-EARTHS, NOT JUPITERS: ACCRETING NEBULAR GAS ONTO SOLID CORES AT 0.1 AU AND BEYOND
Lee, E. J., Chiang, E., & Ormel, C. W. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/95 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., & Seager, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-08-11
- Volume
- 738
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2005561978
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FORMATION AND STRUCTURE OF LOW-DENSITY EXO-NEPTUNES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/59
- The paper
- Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., & Seager, S. (2011). FORMATION AND STRUCTURE OF LOW-DENSITY EXO-NEPTUNES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.