Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM IN DISTANT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES: TURBULENT PRESSURE, FRAGMENTATION, AND CLOUD SCALING RELATIONS IN A DENSE GAS DISK AT z= 2.3

Open access
Swinbank, A. M., Papadopoulos, P. P., Cox, P., Krips, M., Ivison, R. J., Smail, Ian, Thomson, A. P., Neri, R., Richard, J., Ebeling, H.·2011·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have used the Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique (IRAM) Plateau de Bure Interferometer and the Expanded Very Large Array to obtain a high-resolution map of the CO(6–5) and CO(1–0) emission in the lensed, star-forming galaxy SMM J2135−0102 at z = 2.32. The kinematics of the gas are well described by a model of a rotationally supported disk with an inclination-corrected rotation speed, v rot = 320 ± 25 km s −1 , a ratio of rotational-to-dispersion support of v /σ = 3.5 ± 0.2, and a dynamical mass of (6.0 ± 0.5) × 10 10 M ☉ within a radius of 2.5 kpc. The disk has a Toomre parameter, Q = 0.50 ± 0.15, suggesting that the gas will rapidly fragment into massive clumps on scales of L J ∼ 400 pc. We identify star-forming regions on these scales and show that they are ∼10 × denser than those in quiescent environments in local galaxies, and significantly offset from the local molecular cloud scaling relations (Larson's relations). The large offset compared to local molecular cloud line-width–size scaling relations implies that supersonic turbulence should remain dominant on scales ∼100 × smaller than in the kinematically quiescent interstellar medium (ISM) of the Milky Way, while the molecular gas in SMM J2135 is expected to be ∼50 × denser than that in the Milky Way on all scales. This is most likely due to the high external hydrostatic pressure we measure for the ISM, P tot / k B ∼ (2 ± 1) × 10 7 K cm −3 . In such highly turbulent ISM, the subsonic regions of gravitational collapse (and star formation) will be characterized by much higher critical densities, n crit > = 10 8 cm −3 , a factor ≳1000 × more than the quiescent ISM of the Milky Way.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/742/1/11

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Swinbank, A. M., Papadopoulos, P. P., Cox, P., Krips, M., Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., Thomson, A. P., Neri, R., Richard, J., & Ebeling, H.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
742
Issue
1
Pages
11
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2010204939
Cited by
255
References
2
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM IN DISTANT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES: TURBULENT PRESSURE, FRAGMENTATION, AND CLOUD SCALING RELATIONS IN A DENSE GAS DISK AT z= 2.3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/742/1/11
The paper
Swinbank, A. M., Papadopoulos, P. P., Cox, P., Krips, M., Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., Thomson, A. P., Neri, R., Richard, J., & Ebeling, H. (2011). THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM IN DISTANT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES: TURBULENT PRESSURE, FRAGMENTATION, AND CLOUD SCALING RELATIONS IN A DENSE GAS DISK AT z= 2.3. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/742/1/11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.