Cited by 3,349Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

On the Gravitational Stability of a Disk of Stars

Toomre, A.·1964·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

This paper considers the question of the large-scale gravitational stability of an arbitrary, highly flattened stellar system, which is assumed initially to rotate in approximate equilibrium between its self-gravitation and the centrifugal forces. It is concluded that no such disk, if fairly smooth or uniform, can be entirely stable against a tendency to form massive condensations within its own plane, unless the root-mean-square random velocities of its constituents, in the directions parallel to that plane, are everywhere sufficiently large. Lacking such random motions, it is shown that the system must be vulnerable to numerous unstable disturbances, the dimensions of which may approach its over-all radius, and whose times of growth are to be reckoned in fractions of the typical periods of revolution. The minimum root-mean-square radial velocity dispersion required in any one vicinity for the complete suppression of all axisymmetric instabilities is calculated (in collaboration with A. Kalnajs) as 3.36 G /K, where G is the gravitational constant, and and K are the local values of the projected stellar density and the epicyclic frequency, respectively. From that, and the observed j# and K, together with their uncertainties, this minimum for the solar neighborhood of our Galaxy is estimated to fall between 20 and 35 k /sec, a range which indeed encompasses the actual radial velocity dispersions of the most predominant types of stars in our vicinity. It is pointed out that both this curious agreement, and also the well-known discrepancy between the z- and r-velocity dispersions at least of the older disk stars, may be explainable in terms of past instabilities of this galactic disk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/147861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Q > 1 is typically taken to represent disks stable to gravitational collapse.

    “Q > 1 is typically taken to represent disks stable to gravitational collapse.”
  • The excitation of eccentricities elevates radial velocity dispersions above critical values that would cause gravitational instabilities and hinders the accretion of moons.

    “The excitation of eccentricities elevates radial velocity dispersions above critical values that would cause gravitational instabilities (Toomre 1964) and hinders the accretion of moons.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toomre, A.
Corresponding author
Toomre, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1964-05
Volume
139
Pages
1217
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2035547408
Cited by
3,349
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 153 · 2016: 187 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 116
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
gravitational stability, stellar disks, axisymmetric instability, velocity dispersion, epicyclic frequencies, Galactic disk, solar neighborhood, disk stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review