The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TESTING SCALING RELATIONS FOR SOLAR-LIKE OSCILLATIONS FROM THE MAIN SEQUENCE TO RED GIANTS USING KEPLER DATA
Open accessAbstract
We have analyzed solar-like oscillations in ∼1700 stars observed by the Kepler Mission, spanning from the main sequence to the red clump. Using evolutionary models, we test asteroseismic scaling relations for the frequency of maximum power (ν max ), the large frequency separation (Δν), and oscillation amplitudes. We show that the difference of the Δν–ν max relation for unevolved and evolved stars can be explained by different distributions in effective temperature and stellar mass, in agreement with what is expected from scaling relations. For oscillation amplitudes, we show that neither ( L / M ) s scaling nor the revised scaling relation by Kjeldsen & Bedding is accurate for red-giant stars, and demonstrate that a revised scaling relation with a separate luminosity-mass dependence can be used to calculate amplitudes from the main sequence to red giants to a precision of ∼25%. The residuals show an offset particularly for unevolved stars, suggesting that an additional physical dependency is necessary to fully reproduce the observed amplitudes. We investigate correlations between amplitudes and stellar activity, and find evidence that the effect of amplitude suppression is most pronounced for subgiant stars. Finally, we test the location of the cool edge of the instability strip in the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram using solar-like oscillations and find the detections in the hottest stars compatible with a domain of hybrid stochastically excited and opacity driven pulsation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Cited by
Stellar Spin-Orbit Misalignment in a Multiplanet System
Huber, D., Carter, J. A., Barbieri, M., Miglio, A., Deck, K. M., Fabrycky, D. C., Montet, B. T., Buchhave, L. A., Chaplin, W. J., Hekker, S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242066 · Cited by 315
Self-citationMowlavi, N., Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Maeder, A., Charbonnel, C., & Eyer, L. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117749 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, D., Bedding, T. R., Stello, D., Hekker, S., Mathur, S., Mosser, B., Verner, G. A., Bonanno, A., Buzasi, D. L., Campante, T. L., Elsworth, Y. P., Hale, S. J., Kallinger, T., Silva Aguirre, V., Chaplin, W. J., De Ridder, J., García, R. A., Appourchaux, T., Frandsen, S., Houdek, G., Molenda-Żakowicz, J., Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Gilliland, R. L., Kawaler, S. D., Kjeldsen, H., Broomhall, A. M., Corsaro, E., Salabert, D., Sanderfer, D. T., Seader, S. E., & Smith, J. C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 743
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1973500133
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TESTING SCALING RELATIONS FOR SOLAR-LIKE OSCILLATIONS FROM THE MAIN SEQUENCE TO RED GIANTS USING KEPLER DATA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/143
- The paper
- Huber, D., Bedding, T. R., Stello, D., Hekker, S., Mathur, S., Mosser, B., Verner, G. A., Bonanno, A., Buzasi, D. L., Campante, T. L., Elsworth, Y. P., Hale, S. J., Kallinger, T., Silva Aguirre, V., Chaplin, W. J., De Ridder, J., García, R. A., Appourchaux, T., Frandsen, S., . . . Smith, J. C. (2011). TESTING SCALING RELATIONS FOR SOLAR-LIKE OSCILLATIONS FROM THE MAIN SEQUENCE TO RED GIANTS USING KEPLER DATA. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.