The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INVESTIGATING THE COSMIC-RAY IONIZATION RATE IN THE GALACTIC DIFFUSE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM THROUGH OBSERVATIONS OF H+3
Open accessAbstract
Observations of H + 3 in the Galactic diffuse interstellar medium have led to various surprising results, including the conclusion that the cosmic-ray ionization rate (ζ 2 ) is about one order of magnitude larger than previously thought. The present survey expands the sample of diffuse cloud sight lines with H + 3 observations to 50, with detections in 21 of those. Ionization rates inferred from these observations are in the range (1.7 ± 1.3) × 10 −16 s −1 < ζ 2 < (10.6 ± 8.2) × 10 −16 s −1 with a mean value of ζ 2 = (3.5 +5.3 −3.0 ) × 10 −16 s −1 . Upper limits (3σ) derived from non-detections of H + 3 are as low as ζ 2 < 0.4 × 10 −16 s −1 . These low upper limits, in combination with the wide range of inferred cosmic-ray ionization rates, indicate variations in ζ 2 between different diffuse cloud sight lines. A study of ζ 2 versus N H (total hydrogen column density) shows that the two parameters are not correlated for diffuse molecular cloud sight lines, but that the ionization rate decreases when N H increases to values typical of dense molecular clouds. Both the difference in ionization rates between diffuse and dense clouds and the variation of ζ 2 among diffuse cloud sight lines are likely the result of particle propagation effects. The lower ionization rate in dense clouds is due to the inability of low-energy (few MeV) protons to penetrate such regions, while the ionization rate in diffuse clouds is controlled by the proximity of the observed cloud to a site of particle acceleration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A [ITAL]Hipparcos[/ITAL] Census of the Nearby OB Associations
de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., & Blaauw, A. (1999) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300682 · Cited by 1,317
Cited by
Krumholz, M. R. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001 · Cited by 321
The Nine Lives of Cosmic Rays in Galaxies
Grenier, I. A., Black, J. H., & Strong, A. W. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122457 · Cited by 320
Cold gas in the Milky Way’s nuclear wind
Di Teodoro, E. M., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Lockman, F. J., & Armillotta, L. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2595-z · Cited by 61
Yusef-Zadeh, F., Arendt, R. G., Wardle, M., Heywood, I., Cotton, W., & Camilo, F. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4802 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Indriolo, N., & McCall, B. J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-01-03
- Volume
- 745
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2081402642
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INVESTIGATING THE COSMIC-RAY IONIZATION RATE IN THE GALACTIC DIFFUSE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM THROUGH OBSERVATIONS OF H+3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/91
- The paper
- Indriolo, N., & McCall, B. J. (2012). INVESTIGATING THE COSMIC-RAY IONIZATION RATE IN THE GALACTIC DIFFUSE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM THROUGH OBSERVATIONS OF H+3. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.