Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CARNEGIE HUBBLE PROGRAM: A MID-INFRARED CALIBRATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT

Open access
Freedman, Wendy L., Madore, Barry F., Scowcroft, Victoria, Burns, Chris, Monson, Andy, Persson, S. Eric, Seibert, Mark, Rigby, Jane·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Using a mid-infrared calibration of the Cepheid distance scale based on recent observations at 3.6 μm with the Spitzer Space Telescope , we have obtained a new, high-accuracy calibration of the Hubble constant. We have established the mid-IR zero point of the Leavitt law (the Cepheid period–luminosity relation) using time-averaged 3.6 μm data for 10 high-metallicity, Milky Way Cepheids having independently measured trigonometric parallaxes. We have adopted the slope of the PL relation using time-averaged 3.6 μm data for 80 long-period Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) Cepheids falling in the period range 0.8 < log( P ) < 1.8. We find a new reddening-corrected distance to the LMC of 18.477 ± 0.033 (systematic) mag. We re-examine the systematic uncertainties in H 0 , also taking into account new data over the past decade. In combination with the new Spitzer calibration, the systematic uncertainty in H 0 over that obtained by the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project has decreased by over a factor of three. Applying the Spitzer calibration to the Key Project sample, we find a value of H 0 = 74.3 with a systematic uncertainty of ±2.1 (systematic) km s −1 Mpc −1 , corresponding to a 2.8% systematic uncertainty in the Hubble constant. This result, in combination with WMAP7 measurements of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies and assuming a flat universe, yields a value of the equation of state for dark energy, w 0 = −1.09 ± 0.10. Alternatively, relaxing the constraints on flatness and the numbers of relativistic species, and combining our results with those of WMAP7, Type Ia supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations yield w 0 = −1.08 ± 0.10 and a value of N eff = 4.13 ± 0.67, mildly consistent with the existence of a fourth neutrino species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/758/1/24

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V., Burns, C., Monson, A., Persson, S. E., Seibert, M., & Rigby, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-09-21
Volume
758
Issue
1
Pages
24
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1995568970
Cited by
460
References
3
FWCI
31.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CARNEGIE HUBBLE PROGRAM: A MID-INFRARED CALIBRATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/758/1/24
The paper
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V., Burns, C., Monson, A., Persson, S. E., Seibert, M., & Rigby, J. (2012). CARNEGIE HUBBLE PROGRAM: A MID-INFRARED CALIBRATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/758/1/24

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.