The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A COOL DUST FACTORY IN THE CRAB NEBULA: A HERSCHEL STUDY OF THE FILAMENTS
Open accessAbstract
Whether supernovae are major sources of dust in galaxies is a long-standing debate. We present infrared and submillimeter photometry and spectroscopy from the Herschel Space Observatory of the Crab Nebula between 51 and 670 μm as part of the Mass Loss from Evolved StarS program. We compare the emission detected with Herschel with multiwavelength data including millimeter, radio, mid-infrared, and archive optical images. We carefully remove the synchrotron component using the Herschel and Planck fluxes measured in the same epoch. The contribution from line emission is removed using Herschel spectroscopy combined with Infrared Space Observatory archive data. Several forbidden lines of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen are detected where multiple velocity components are resolved, deduced to be from the nitrogen-depleted, carbon-rich ejecta. No spectral lines are detected in the SPIRE wavebands; in the PACS bands, the line contribution is 5% and 10% at 70 and 100 μm and negligible at 160 μm. After subtracting the synchrotron and line emission, the remaining far-infrared continuum can be fit with two dust components. Assuming standard interstellar silicates, the mass of the cooler component is 0.24 +0.32 − 0.08 M ☉ for T = 28.1 +5.5 − 3.2 K. Amorphous carbon grains require 0.11 ± 0.01 M ☉ of dust with T = 33.8 +2.3 − 1.8 K. A single temperature modified blackbody with 0.14 M ☉ and 0.08 M ☉ for silicate and carbon dust, respectively, provides an adequate fit to the far-infrared region of the spectral energy distribution but is a poor fit at 24–500 μm. The Crab Nebula has condensed most of the relevant refractory elements into dust, suggesting the formation of dust in core-collapse supernova ejecta is efficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Cited by
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez, H. L., Krause, O., Barlow, M. J., Swinyard, B. M., Owen, P. J., Clark, C. J. R., Matsuura, M., Gomez, E. L., Rho, J., Besel, M.-A., Bouwman, J., Gear, W. K., Henning, T., Ivison, R. J., Polehampton, E. T., & Sibthorpe, B.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-11-07
- Volume
- 760
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2034535798
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A COOL DUST FACTORY IN THE CRAB NEBULA: A HERSCHEL STUDY OF THE FILAMENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/96
- The paper
- Gomez, H. L., Krause, O., Barlow, M. J., Swinyard, B. M., Owen, P. J., Clark, C. J. R., Matsuura, M., Gomez, E. L., Rho, J., Besel, M.-A., Bouwman, J., Gear, W. K., Henning, T., Ivison, R. J., Polehampton, E. T., & Sibthorpe, B. (2012). A COOL DUST FACTORY IN THE CRAB NEBULA: A HERSCHEL STUDY OF THE FILAMENTS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/96
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.