The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE STAR FORMATION RATE OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS: COMPARING THEORY, SIMULATIONS, AND OBSERVATIONS
Open accessAbstract
The role of turbulence and magnetic fields is studied for star formation in molecular clouds. We derive and compare six theoretical models for the star formation rate (SFR)—the Krumholz & McKee (KM), Padoan & Nordlund (PN), and Hennebelle & Chabrier (HC) models, and three multi-freefall versions of these, suggested by HC—all based on integrals over the log-normal distribution of turbulent gas. We extend all theories to include magnetic fields and show that the SFR depends on four basic parameters: (1) virial parameter α vir ; (2) sonic Mach number ; (3) turbulent forcing parameter b , which is a measure for the fraction of energy driven in compressive modes; and (4) plasma with the Alfvén Mach number . We compare all six theories with MHD simulations, covering cloud masses of 300 to 4 × 10 6 M ☉ and Mach numbers –50 and – ∞ , with solenoidal ( b = 1/3), mixed ( b = 0.4), and compressive turbulent ( b = 1) forcings. We find that the SFR increases by a factor of four between and 50 for compressive turbulent forcing and α vir ∼ 1. Comparing forcing parameters, we see that the SFR is more than 10 times higher with compressive than solenoidal forcing for simulations. The SFR and fragmentation are both reduced by a factor of two in strongly magnetized, trans-Alfvénic turbulence compared to hydrodynamic turbulence. All simulations are fit simultaneously by the multi-freefall KM and multi-freefall PN theories within a factor of two over two orders of magnitude in SFR. The simulated SFRs cover the range and correlation of SFR column density with gas column density observed in Galactic clouds, and agree well for star formation efficiencies SFE = 1%–10% and local efficiencies = 0.3–0.7 due to feedback. We conclude that the SFR is primarily controlled by interstellar turbulence, with a secondary effect coming from magnetic fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 3×
“…of the form ΣSFR ∝ ΣNgas (albeit with significant scatter), similar in exponents N ≈ 1–2 to the KennicuttSchmidt relation (Schmidt 1959; Kennicutt 1998) and follow-up measurements for molecular gas (e.g., Wong & Blitz 2002; Gao & Solomon 2004; Bigiel et al. 2008; Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
Background
Cited by
Könyves, V., André, P., Men’shchikov, A., Palmeirim, P., Arzoumanian, D., Schneider, N., Roy, A., Didelon, P., Maury, A., Shimajiri, Y., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525861 · Cited by 486
ON THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS
Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/51 · Cited by 403
Self-citationPHANGS–ALMA: Arcsecond CO(2–1) Imaging of Nearby Star-forming Galaxies
Leroy, A. K., Schinnerer, E., Hughes, A., Rosolowsky, E., Pety, J., Schruba, A., Usero, A., Blanc, G. A., Chevance, M., Emsellem, E., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3 · Cited by 391
Self-citationGlobal hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario
Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Gómez, G. C., & Zamora-Avilés, M. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2736 · Cited by 361
On the diversity and statistical properties of protostellar discs
Bate, M. R. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty169 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-12-05
- Volume
- 761
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2161309678
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE STAR FORMATION RATE OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS: COMPARING THEORY, SIMULATIONS, AND OBSERVATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/156
- The paper
- Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. (2012). THE STAR FORMATION RATE OF TURBULENT MAGNETIZED CLOUDS: COMPARING THEORY, SIMULATIONS, AND OBSERVATIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.