The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE z= 5 QUASAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION FROM SDSS STRIPE 82
Open accessAbstract
We present a measurement of the Type I quasar luminosity function at z = 5 using a large sample of spectroscopically confirmed quasars selected from optical imaging data. We measure the bright end ( M 1450 < −26) with Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data covering ∼6000 deg 2 , then extend to lower luminosities ( M 1450 < −24) with newly discovered, faint z ∼ 5 quasars selected from 235 deg 2 of deep, coadded imaging in the SDSS Stripe 82 region (the celestial equator in the Southern Galactic Cap). The faint sample includes 14 quasars with spectra obtained as ancillary science targets in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, and 59 quasars observed at the MMT and Magellan telescopes. We construct a well-defined sample of 4.7 < z < 5.1 quasars that is highly complete, with 73 spectroscopic identifications out of 92 candidates. Our color selection method is also highly efficient: of the 73 spectra obtained, 71 are high-redshift quasars. These observations reach below the break in the luminosity function ( ). The bright-end slope is steep (β ≲ −4), with a constraint of β < −3.1 at 95% confidence. The break luminosity appears to evolve strongly at high redshift, providing an explanation for the flattening of the bright-end slope reported previously. We find a factor of ∼2 greater decrease in the number density of luminous quasars ( M 1450 < −26) from z = 5 to z = 6 than from z = 4 to z = 5, suggesting a more rapid decline in quasar activity at high redshift than found in previous surveys. Our model for the quasar luminosity function predicts that quasars generate ∼30% of the ionizing photons required to keep hydrogen in the universe ionized at z = 5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Self-citationAn Improved Photometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data
Padmanabhan, N., Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Barentine, J. C., Blanton, M. R., Brewington, H. J., Gunn, J. E., Harvanek, M., Hogg, D. W., Ivezić, Ž., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/524677 · Cited by 591
Self-citation
Cited by
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
THE SDSS-IV EXTENDED BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY: OVERVIEW AND EARLY DATA
Dawson, K. S., Kneib, J.-P., Percival, W. J., Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Anderson, S. F., Armengaud, E., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., Bautista, J. E., et al. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/44 · Cited by 844
Self-citationActive galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
Self-citationBañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Decarli, R., Farina, E. P., Mazzucchelli, C., Walter, F., Fan, X., Stern, D., Schlafly, E., Chambers, K. C., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/11 · Cited by 382
Self-citationThe MassiveBlack-II simulation: the evolution of haloes and galaxies to z ∼ 0
Khandai, N., Di Matteo, T., Croft, R., Wilkins, S., Feng, Y., Tucker, E., DeGraf, C., & Liu, M.-S. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv627 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McGreer, I. D., Jiang, L., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., Ross, N. P., White, M., Shen, Y., Schneider, D. P., Myers, A. D., Brandt, W. N., DeGraf, C., Glikman, E., Ge, J., & Streblyanska, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-04-19
- Volume
- 768
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2079716425
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE z= 5 QUASAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION FROM SDSS STRIPE 82. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/105
- The paper
- McGreer, I. D., Jiang, L., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., Ross, N. P., White, M., Shen, Y., Schneider, D. P., Myers, A. D., Brandt, W. N., DeGraf, C., Glikman, E., Ge, J., & Streblyanska, A. (2013). THE z= 5 QUASAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION FROM SDSS STRIPE 82. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.