Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE z= 5 QUASAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION FROM SDSS STRIPE 82

Open access
McGreer, Ian D., Jiang, Linhua, Fan, Xiaohui, Richards, Gordon T., Strauss, Michael A., Ross, Nicholas P., White, Martin, Shen, Yue, Schneider, Donald P., Myers, Adam D., Brandt, W. Niel, DeGraf, Colin, Glikman, Eilat, Ge, Jian, Streblyanska, Alina·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a measurement of the Type I quasar luminosity function at z = 5 using a large sample of spectroscopically confirmed quasars selected from optical imaging data. We measure the bright end ( M 1450 < −26) with Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data covering ∼6000 deg 2 , then extend to lower luminosities ( M 1450 < −24) with newly discovered, faint z ∼ 5 quasars selected from 235 deg 2 of deep, coadded imaging in the SDSS Stripe 82 region (the celestial equator in the Southern Galactic Cap). The faint sample includes 14 quasars with spectra obtained as ancillary science targets in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, and 59 quasars observed at the MMT and Magellan telescopes. We construct a well-defined sample of 4.7 < z < 5.1 quasars that is highly complete, with 73 spectroscopic identifications out of 92 candidates. Our color selection method is also highly efficient: of the 73 spectra obtained, 71 are high-redshift quasars. These observations reach below the break in the luminosity function ( ). The bright-end slope is steep (β ≲ −4), with a constraint of β < −3.1 at 95% confidence. The break luminosity appears to evolve strongly at high redshift, providing an explanation for the flattening of the bright-end slope reported previously. We find a factor of ∼2 greater decrease in the number density of luminous quasars ( M 1450 < −26) from z = 5 to z = 6 than from z = 4 to z = 5, suggesting a more rapid decline in quasar activity at high redshift than found in previous surveys. Our model for the quasar luminosity function predicts that quasars generate ∼30% of the ionizing photons required to keep hydrogen in the universe ionized at z = 5.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/105

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
McGreer, I. D., Jiang, L., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., Ross, N. P., White, M., Shen, Y., Schneider, D. P., Myers, A. D., Brandt, W. N., DeGraf, C., Glikman, E., Ge, J., & Streblyanska, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-04-19
Volume
768
Issue
2
Pages
105
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2079716425
Cited by
226
References
4
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE z= 5 QUASAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION FROM SDSS STRIPE 82. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/105
The paper
McGreer, I. D., Jiang, L., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., Ross, N. P., White, M., Shen, Y., Schneider, D. P., Myers, A. D., Brandt, W. N., DeGraf, C., Glikman, E., Ge, J., & Streblyanska, A. (2013). THE z= 5 QUASAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION FROM SDSS STRIPE 82. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.