MEASURING GALAXY STAR FORMATION RATES FROM INTEGRATED PHOTOMETRY: INSIGHTS FROM COLOR-MAGNITUDE DIAGRAMS OF RESOLVED STARS
Open accessAbstract
We use empirical star formation histories (SFHs), measured from Hubble-Space-Telescope -based resolved star color–magnitude diagrams, as input into population synthesis codes to model the broadband spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of 50 nearby dwarf galaxies (6.5 < log M * / M ☉ < 8.5, with metallicities ∼10% solar). In the presence of realistic SFHs, we compare the modeled and observed SEDs from the ultraviolet (UV) through near-infrared and assess the reliability of widely used UV-based star formation rate (SFR) indicators. In the FUV through i bands, we find that the observed and modeled SEDs are in excellent agreement. In the Spitzer 3.6 μm and 4.5 μm bands, we find that modeled SEDs systematically overpredict observed luminosities by up to ∼0.2 dex, depending on treatment of the TP-AGB stars in the synthesis models. We assess the reliability of UV luminosity as a SFR indicator, in light of independently constrained SFHs. We find that fluctuations in the SFHs alone can cause factor of ∼2 variations in the UV luminosities relative to the assumption of a constant SFH over the past 100 Myr. These variations are not strongly correlated with UV-optical colors, implying that correcting UV-based SFRs for the effects of realistic SFHs is difficult using only the broadband SED. Additionally, for this diverse sample of galaxies, we find that stars older than 100 Myr can contribute from <5%–100% of the present day UV luminosity, highlighting the challenges in defining a characteristic star formation timescale associated with UV emission. We do find a relationship between UV emission timescale and broadband UV-optical color, though it is different than predictions based on exponentially declining SFH models. Our findings have significant implications for the comparison of UV-based SFRs across low-metallicity populations with diverse SFHs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although there is scatter, the vast majority of regions agree markedly well within the about 20% uncertainty associated with UV emission from older stellar populations.
“Although there is scatter, the vast majority of regions agree markedly well within the ∼ 20% uncertainty associated with UV emission from older stellar populations (e.g., Johnson et al. 2013).”
From The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Southern Treasury (PHAST). II. The Spatially Resolved Recent Star Formation History in M31 (2026) · cites this paper as Johnson et al. 2013
Cites
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For a constant SFR this cumulative fraction shows an almost linear rise in the FUV, as nearly equal amounts of the current FUV luminosity are contributed by stars in equal logarithmic age bins, up to∼100 Myr ages (see also Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationESTIMATING THE STAR FORMATION RATE AT 1 kpc SCALES IN NEARBY GALAXIES
Leroy, A. K., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Boissier, S., Bolatto, A., Brinks, E., Madore, B., Munoz-Mateos, J.-C., Murphy, E., Sandstrom, K., et al. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/3 · Cited by 203 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, when considering small parts of larger galaxies, for example to generate SFR maps, such SFH variations may be present and induce significant uncertainty in maps of SFR derived from UV luminosities (e.g., Bigiel et al. 2008; Leroy et al. 2012).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CALIBRATING UV STAR FORMATION RATES FOR DWARF GALAXIES FROM STARBIRDS
McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Dolphin, A. E., & Mitchell, N. P. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/109 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationLewis, A. R., Simones, J. E., Johnson, B. D., Dalcanton, J. J., Skillman, E. D., Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Williams, B. F., Bell, E. F., Fouesneau, M., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/70 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationWainer, T. M., Williams, B. F., Chen, Z., Lazzarini, M., Dalcanton, J. J., Bell, E. F., Goold, K., Dolphin, A., Durbin, M. J., Dubón, S. L. F., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae6db9
Self-citation
- Authors
- Johnson, B. D., Weisz, D. R., Dalcanton, J. J., Johnson, L. C., Dale, D. A., Dolphin, A. E., Gil de Paz, A., Kennicutt, R. C., Lee, J. C., Skillman, E. D., Boquien, M., & Williams, B. F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- RTX (United States) (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-06-27
- Volume
- 772
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2016201661
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Library Open Repository (Universidad Complutense Madrid) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Yale University
- Vanderbilt University
- Princeton University
- Ohio State University
- Harvard University
- University of Washington
- Johns Hopkins University
- Carnegie Mellon University
- University of Portsmouth
- New Mexico State University
- York University
- Office of Science
- College of Engineering, Michigan State University
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/H00243X/1)
- Brookhaven National Laboratory
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- star formation rate, dwarf galaxies, star formation history, spectral energy distribution, color-magnitude diagram, population synthesis, TP-AGB stars, star formation timescales, low-metallicity galaxies, resolved stellar populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review