The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GALAXY CLUSTER BARYON FRACTIONS REVISITED
Open accessAbstract
We measure the baryons contained in both the stellar and hot-gas components for 12 galaxy clusters and groups at z ∼ 0.1 with M = 1–5 × 10 14 M ☉ . This paper improves upon our previous work through the addition of XMM-Newton X-ray data, enabling measurements of the total mass and masses of each major baryonic component—intracluster medium, intracluster stars, and stars in galaxies—for each system. We recover a mean relation for the stellar mass versus halo mass, , that is 1σ shallower than in our previous result. We confirm that the partitioning of baryons between the stellar and hot-gas components is a strong function of M 500 ; the fractions of total mass in stars and X-ray gas within a sphere of radius r 500 scale as and , respectively. We also confirm that the combination of the brightest cluster galaxy and intracluster stars is an increasingly important contributor to the stellar baryon budget in lower halo masses. Studies that fail to fully account for intracluster stars typically underestimate the normalization of the stellar baryon fraction versus M 500 relation by ∼25%. Our derived stellar baryon fractions are also higher, and the trend with halo mass weaker, than those derived from recent halo occupation distribution and abundance matching analyses. One difference from our previous work is the weak, but statistically significant, dependence here of the total baryon fraction upon halo mass: . For M 500 ≳ 2 × 10 14 , the total baryon fractions within r 500 are on average 18% below the universal value from the seven year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) analysis, or 7% below for the cosmological parameters from the Planck analysis. In the latter case, the difference between the universal value and cluster baryon fractions is less than the systematic uncertainties associated with the M 500 determinations. The total baryon fractions exhibit significant scatter, particularly at M 500 < 2 × 10 14 M ☉ where they range from 60%–90%, or 65%–100%, of the universal value for WMAP 7 and Planck, respectively. The ratio of the stellar-to-gas mass within r 500 ( M ⋆ / M gas ), a measure of integrated star-formation efficiency, strongly decreases with increasing M 500 . This relation is tight, with an implied intrinsic scatter of 12%. The fact that this relation remains tight at low mass implies that the larger scatter in the total baryon fractions at these masses arises from either true scatter in the total baryon content or observational scatter in M 500 rather than late-time physical processes such as redistribution of gas to beyond r 500 . If the scatter in the baryon content at low mass is physical, then our results imply that in this mass range, the integrated star-formation efficiency rather than the baryon fraction that is constant at fixed halo mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
Cited by
The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2058 · Cited by 3,601
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Davies, J. J., Crain, R. A., Oppenheimer, B. D., & Schaye, J. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3201 · Cited by 167
Cosmological constraints with deep learning from KiDS-450 weak lensing maps
Fluri, J., Kacprzak, T., Lucchi, A., Refregier, A., Amara, A., Hofmann, T., & Schneider, A. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063514 · Cited by 151
Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Ayromlou, M., Lee, W., Lehle, K., Rohr, E., & Truong, N. (2024) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348608 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez, A. H., Sivanandam, S., Zabludoff, A. I., & Zaritsky, D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-10-29
- Volume
- 778
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2077148818
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GALAXY CLUSTER BARYON FRACTIONS REVISITED. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/14
- The paper
- Gonzalez, A. H., Sivanandam, S., Zabludoff, A. I., & Zaritsky, D. (2013). GALAXY CLUSTER BARYON FRACTIONS REVISITED. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.