THE PANCHROMATIC HUBBLE ANDROMEDA TREASURY. VI. THE RELIABILITY OF FAR-ULTRAVIOLET FLUX AS A STAR FORMATION TRACER ON SUBKILOPARSEC SCALES
Open accessAbstract
We have used optical observations of resolved stars from the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury to measure the recent (<500 Myr) star formation histories (SFHs) of 33 far-UV (FUV)-bright regions in M31. The region areas ranged from ∼10 4 to 10 6 pc 2 , which allowed us to test the reliability of FUV flux as a tracer of recent star formation on subkiloparsec scales. The star formation rates (SFRs) derived from the extinction-corrected observed FUV fluxes were, on average, consistent with the 100 Myr mean SFRs of the SFHs to within the 1σ scatter. Overall, the scatter was larger than the uncertainties in the SFRs and particularly evident among the smallest regions. The scatter was consistent with an even combination of discrete sampling of the initial mass function and high variability in the SFHs. This result demonstrates the importance of satisfying both the full-IMF and the constant-SFR assumptions for obtaining precise SFR estimates from FUV flux. Assuming a robust FUV extinction correction, we estimate that a factor of 2.5 uncertainty can be expected in FUV-based SFRs for regions smaller than 10 5 pc 2 or a few hundred parsecs. We also examined ages and masses derived from UV flux under the common assumption that the regions are simple stellar populations (SSPs). The SFHs showed that most of the regions are not SSPs, and the age and mass estimates were correspondingly discrepant from the SFHs. For those regions with SSP-like SFHs, we found mean discrepancies of 10 Myr in age and a factor of 3–4 in mass. It was not possible to distinguish the SSP-like regions from the others based on integrated FUV flux.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The region size balances the need for resolved structures with sufficient CMD sampling to constrain the SFH.
“This region size balances the need for resolved structures (e.g., OB associations, H II regions) with sufficient CMD sampling to constrain the SFH (e.g., Simones et al. 2014).”
From The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Southern Treasury (PHAST). II. The Spatially Resolved Recent Star Formation History in M31 (2026) · cites this paper as Simones et al. 2014
Cites
ESTIMATING THE STAR FORMATION RATE AT 1 kpc SCALES IN NEARBY GALAXIES
Leroy, A. K., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Boissier, S., Bolatto, A., Brinks, E., Madore, B., Munoz-Mateos, J.-C., Murphy, E., Sandstrom, K., et al. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/3 · Cited by 203 · cited 10× · see citing works
“In the extreme case of an SSP, Leroy et al. (2012) found that FUV-based SFR estimates are intrinsically scattered by a factor of ∼ 3 to 4 (σ ≈ 0.5 to 0.6 in log space) due to uncertainty about the age of the SSP within a 100 Myr timescale.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lewis, A. R., Dolphin, A. E., Dalcanton, J. J., Weisz, D. R., Williams, B. F., Bell, E. F., Seth, A. C., Simones, J. E., Skillman, E. D., Choi, Y., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/183 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationLewis, A. R., Simones, J. E., Johnson, B. D., Dalcanton, J. J., Skillman, E. D., Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Williams, B. F., Bell, E. F., Fouesneau, M., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/70 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationWainer, T. M., Williams, B. F., Chen, Z., Lazzarini, M., Dalcanton, J. J., Bell, E. F., Goold, K., Dolphin, A., Durbin, M. J., Dubón, S. L. F., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae6db9
Self-citation
- Authors
- Simones, J. E., Weisz, D. R., Skillman, E. D., Bell, E. F., Bianchi, L., Dalcanton, J. J., Dolphin, A. E., Johnson, B. D., & Williams, B. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- RTX (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 788
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2092743273
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555, 526555)
- California Institute of Technology
- Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, GO-12055, 26555)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- star formation rate, star formation history, M31, extinction correction, initial mass function, simple stellar populations, resolved stellar populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review