Cited by 14Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

THE PANCHROMATIC HUBBLE ANDROMEDA TREASURY. VI. THE RELIABILITY OF FAR-ULTRAVIOLET FLUX AS A STAR FORMATION TRACER ON SUBKILOPARSEC SCALES

Open access
Simones, Jacob E., Weisz, Daniel R., Skillman, Evan D., Bell, Eric F., Bianchi, Luciana, Dalcanton, Julianne J., Dolphin, Andrew E., Johnson, Benjamin D. +1 more·2014·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have used optical observations of resolved stars from the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury to measure the recent (<500 Myr) star formation histories (SFHs) of 33 far-UV (FUV)-bright regions in M31. The region areas ranged from ∼10 4 to 10 6 pc 2 , which allowed us to test the reliability of FUV flux as a tracer of recent star formation on subkiloparsec scales. The star formation rates (SFRs) derived from the extinction-corrected observed FUV fluxes were, on average, consistent with the 100 Myr mean SFRs of the SFHs to within the 1σ scatter. Overall, the scatter was larger than the uncertainties in the SFRs and particularly evident among the smallest regions. The scatter was consistent with an even combination of discrete sampling of the initial mass function and high variability in the SFHs. This result demonstrates the importance of satisfying both the full-IMF and the constant-SFR assumptions for obtaining precise SFR estimates from FUV flux. Assuming a robust FUV extinction correction, we estimate that a factor of 2.5 uncertainty can be expected in FUV-based SFRs for regions smaller than 10 5 pc 2 or a few hundred parsecs. We also examined ages and masses derived from UV flux under the common assumption that the regions are simple stellar populations (SSPs). The SFHs showed that most of the regions are not SSPs, and the age and mass estimates were correspondingly discrepant from the SFHs. For those regions with SSP-like SFHs, we found mean discrepancies of 10 Myr in age and a factor of 3–4 in mass. It was not possible to distinguish the SSP-like regions from the others based on integrated FUV flux.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/12

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • ESTIMATING THE STAR FORMATION RATE AT 1 kpc SCALES IN NEARBY GALAXIES

    Leroy, A. K., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Boissier, S., Bolatto, A., Brinks, E., Madore, B., Munoz-Mateos, J.-C., Murphy, E., Sandstrom, K., et al. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/3 · Cited by 203 · cited 10× · see citing works

    “In the extreme case of an SSP, Leroy et al. (2012) found that FUV-based SFR estimates are intrinsically scattered by a factor of ∼ 3 to 4 (σ ≈ 0.5 to 0.6 in log space) due to uncertainty about the age of the SSP within a 100 Myr timescale.”
    BackgroundMethodResultInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simones, J. E., Weisz, D. R., Skillman, E. D., Bell, E. F., Bianchi, L., Dalcanton, J. J., Dolphin, A. E., Johnson, B. D., & Williams, B. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • RTX (United States) (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2014-05-16
Volume
788
Issue
1
Pages
12
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2092743273
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555, 526555)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, GO-12055, 26555)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
star formation rate, star formation history, M31, extinction correction, initial mass function, simple stellar populations, resolved stellar populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review