Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A CENSUS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN THE Z∼ 9-10 UNIVERSE BASED ON HST+SPITZER OBSERVATIONS OVER 19 CLASH CLUSTERS: THREE CANDIDATE Z∼ 9-10 GALAXIES AND IMPROVED CONSTRAINTS ON THE STAR FORMATION RATE DENSITY AT Z∼ 9.2

Open access
Bouwens, R. J., Bradley, L., Zitrin, A., Coe, D., Franx, M., Zheng, W., Smit, R., Host, O., Postman, M., Moustakas, L., Labbé, I., Carrasco, M., Molino, A., Donahue, M., Kelson, D.D., Meneghetti, M., Benítez, N., Lemze, D., Umetsu, K., Broadhurst, T., Moustakas, J., Rosati, P., Jouvel, S., Bartelmann, M., Ford, H., Graves, G., Grillo, C., Infante, L., Jimenez-Teja, Y., Lahav, O., Maoz, D., Medezinski, E., Melchior, P., Merten, J., Nonino, M., Ogaz, S., Seitz, S.·2014·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We utilize a two-color Lyman-break selection criterion to search for z ∼ 9–10 galaxies over the first 19 clusters in the CLASH program. A systematic search yields three z ∼ 9–10 candidates. While we have already reported the most robust of these candidates, MACS1149-JD, two additional z ∼ 9 candidates are also found and have H 160 -band magnitudes of ∼26.2–26.9. A careful assessment of various sources of contamination suggests ≲1 contaminants for our z ∼ 9–10 selection. To determine the implications of these search results for the luminosity function (LF) and star formation rate density at z ∼ 9, we introduce a new differential approach to deriving these quantities in lensing fields. Our procedure is to derive the evolution by comparing the number of z ∼ 9–10 galaxy candidates found in CLASH with the number of galaxies in a slightly lower-redshift sample (after correcting for the differences in selection volumes), here taken to be z ∼ 8. This procedure takes advantage of the fact that the relative volumes available for the z ∼ 8 and z ∼ 9–10 selections behind lensing clusters are not greatly dependent on the details of the lensing models. We find that the normalization of the UV LF at z ∼ 9 is just that at z ∼ 8, which is ∼1.4 × lower than extrapolating z ∼ 4–8 LF results. While consistent with the evolution in the UV LF seen at z ∼ 4–8, these results marginally favor a more rapid evolution at z > 8. Compared to similar evolutionary findings from the HUDF, our result is less insensitive to large-scale structure uncertainties, given our many independent sightlines on the high-redshift universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/795/2/126

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Bouwens, R. J., Bradley, L., Zitrin, A., Coe, D., Franx, M., Zheng, W., Smit, R., Host, O., Postman, M., Moustakas, L., Labbé, I., Carrasco, M., Molino, A., Donahue, M., Kelson, D. D., Meneghetti, M., Benítez, N., Lemze, D., Umetsu, K., Broadhurst, T., Moustakas, J., Rosati, P., Jouvel, S., Bartelmann, M., Ford, H., Graves, G., Grillo, C., Infante, L., Jimenez-Teja, Y., Lahav, O., Maoz, D., Medezinski, E., Melchior, P., Merten, J., Nonino, M., Ogaz, S., & Seitz, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2014-10-22
Volume
795
Issue
2
Pages
126
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2039781173
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
16.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CENSUS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN THE Z∼ 9-10 UNIVERSE BASED ON HST+SPITZER OBSERVATIONS OVER 19 CLASH CLUSTERS: THREE CANDIDATE Z∼ 9-10 GALAXIES AND IMPROVED CONSTRAINTS ON THE STAR FORMATION RATE DENSITY AT Z∼ 9.2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/795/2/126
The paper
Bouwens, R. J., Bradley, L., Zitrin, A., Coe, D., Franx, M., Zheng, W., Smit, R., Host, O., Postman, M., Moustakas, L., Labbé, I., Carrasco, M., Molino, A., Donahue, M., Kelson, D. D., Meneghetti, M., Benítez, N., Lemze, D., Umetsu, K., . . . Seitz, S. (2014). A CENSUS OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN THE Z∼ 9-10 UNIVERSE BASED ON HST+SPITZER OBSERVATIONS OVER 19 CLASH CLUSTERS: THREE CANDIDATE Z∼ 9-10 GALAXIES AND IMPROVED CONSTRAINTS ON THE STAR FORMATION RATE DENSITY AT Z∼ 9.2. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/795/2/126

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.