Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

UV LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS AT REDSHIFTS z∼ 4 TO z∼ 10: 10,000 GALAXIES FROM HST LEGACY FIELDS

Open access
Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., Trenti, M., Labbé, I., Bradley, L., Carollo, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Gonzalez, V., Holwerda, B., Franx, M., Spitler, L., Smit, R., Magee, D.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The remarkable Hubble Space Telescope(HST) data sets from the CANDELS, HUDF09, HUDF12, ERS, and BoRG/HIPPIES programs have allowed us to map the evolution of the rest-frame UV luminosity function (LF) from z 10 to z 4. We develop new color criteria that more optimally utilize the full wavelength coverage from the optical, near-IR, and mid-IR observations over our search fields, while simultaneously minimizing the incompleteness and eliminating redshift gaps.We have identified 5859, 3001, 857, 481, 217, and 6 galaxy candidates at z 4, z 5, z 6, z 7, z 8, and z 10, respectively, from the ∼1000 arcmin 2 area covered by these data sets.This sample of >10,000 galaxy candidates at ⩾ z 4 is by far the largest assembled to date with HST.The selection of z 4-8 candidates over the five CANDELS fields allows us to assess the cosmic variance; the largest variations are at ⩾ z 7. Our new LF determinations at z 4 and z 5 span a 6 mag baseline and reach to -16 AB mag.These determinations agree well with previous estimates, but the larger samples and volumes probed here result in a more reliable sampling of >L* galaxies and allow us to reassess the form of the UV LFs.Our new LF results strengthen our earlier findings to s 3.4 significance for a steeper faint-end slope of the UV LF at > z 4, with α evolving from a = -  1.64 0.04 at z 4 to a = -  2.06 0.13 at z 7 (and a = -  2.02 0.23 at z 8), consistent with that expected from the evolution of the halo mass function.We find less evolution in the characteristic magnitude M * from z 7 to z 4; the observed evolution in the LF is now largely represented by changes in f*.No evidence for a non-Schechter-like form to the z ∼ 4-8 LFs is found.A simple conditional LF model based on halo growth and evolution in the M/L ratio µ + - z ( ( 1) ) 1.5 of halos provides a good representation of the observed evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/34

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,298

Metadata

Authors
Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., Trenti, M., Labbé, I., Bradley, L., Carollo, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Gonzalez, V., Holwerda, B., Franx, M., Spitler, L., Smit, R., & Magee, D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-04-13
Volume
803
Issue
1
Pages
34
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2062616383
Cited by
1,298
References
4
FWCI
98.01
Type
journal article
Language
he
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UV LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS AT REDSHIFTS z∼ 4 TO z∼ 10: 10,000 GALAXIES FROM HST LEGACY FIELDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/34
The paper
Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., Trenti, M., Labbé, I., Bradley, L., Carollo, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Gonzalez, V., Holwerda, B., Franx, M., Spitler, L., Smit, R., & Magee, D. (2015). UV LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS AT REDSHIFTS z∼ 4 TO z∼ 10: 10,000 GALAXIES FROM HST LEGACY FIELDS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/34

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.