Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WEATHER ON OTHER WORLDS. II. SURVEY RESULTS: SPOTS ARE UBIQUITOUS ON L AND T DWARFS

Open access
Metchev, Stanimir A., Heinze, Aren, Apai, Dániel, Flateau, Davin, Radigan, Jacqueline, Burgasser, Adam, Marley, Mark S., Artigau, Étienne, Plavchan, Peter, Goldman, Bertrand·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present results from the Weather on Other Worlds Spitzer Exploration Science program to investigate photometric variability in L and T dwarfs, usually attributed to patchy clouds. We surveyed 44 L3–T8 dwarfs, spanning a range of J − K s colors and surface gravities. We find that 14/23 ( , 95% confidence) of our single L3–L9.5 dwarfs are variable with peak-to-peak amplitudes between 0.2% and 1.5%, and 5/16 ( ) of our single T0–T8 dwarfs are variable with amplitudes between 0.8% and 4.6%. After correcting for sensitivity, we find that of L dwarfs vary by ⩾0.2%, and of T dwarfs vary by ⩾0.4%. Given viewing geometry considerations, we conclude that photospheric heterogeneities causing >0.2% 3–5 μm flux variations are present on virtually all L dwarfs, and probably on most T dwarfs. A third of L dwarf variables show irregular light curves, indicating that L dwarfs may have multiple spots that evolve over a single rotation. Also, approximately a third of the periodicities are on timescales >10 hr, suggesting that slowly rotating brown dwarfs may be common. We observe an increase in the maximum amplitudes over the entire spectral type range, revealing a potential for greater temperature contrasts in T dwarfs than in L dwarfs. We find a tentative association (92% confidence) between low surface gravity and high-amplitude variability among L3–L5.5 dwarfs. Although we can not confirm whether lower gravity is also correlated with a higher incidence of variables, the result is promising for the characterization of directly imaged young extrasolar planets through variability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/154

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Metchev, S. A., Heinze, A., Apai, D., Flateau, D., Radigan, J., Burgasser, A., Marley, M. S., Artigau, É., Plavchan, P., & Goldman, B.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-01-27
Volume
799
Issue
2
Pages
154
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2055333011
Cited by
277
References
90
FWCI
23.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WEATHER ON OTHER WORLDS. II. SURVEY RESULTS: SPOTS ARE UBIQUITOUS ON L AND T DWARFS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/154
The paper
Metchev, S. A., Heinze, A., Apai, D., Flateau, D., Radigan, J., Burgasser, A., Marley, M. S., Artigau, É., Plavchan, P., & Goldman, B. (2015). WEATHER ON OTHER WORLDS. II. SURVEY RESULTS: SPOTS ARE UBIQUITOUS ON L AND T DWARFS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.