Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OBSCURATION-DEPENDENT EVOLUTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

Open access
Buchner, Johannes, Georgakakis, Antonis, Nandra, Kirpal, Brightman, Murray, Menzel, Marie-Luise, Liu, Zhu, Hsu, Li-Ting, Salvato, Mara, Rangel, Cyprian, Aird, James, Merloni, Andrea, Ross, Nicholas·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We aim to constrain the evolution of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) as a function of obscuration using an X-ray-selected sample of ∼2000 AGNs from a multi-tiered survey including the CDFS, AEGIS-XD, COSMOS, and XMM -XXL fields. The spectra of individual X-ray sources are analyzed using a Bayesian methodology with a physically realistic model to infer the posterior distribution of the hydrogen column density and intrinsic X-ray luminosity. We develop a novel non-parametric method that allows us to robustly infer the distribution of the AGN population in X-ray luminosity, redshift, and obscuring column density, relying only on minimal smoothness assumptions. Our analysis properly incorporates uncertainties from low count spectra, photometric redshift measurements, association incompleteness, and the limited sample size. We find that obscured AGNs with N H > 10 22 cm −2 account for of the number density and luminosity density of the accretion supermassive black hole population with L X > 10 43 erg s −1 , averaged over cosmic time. Compton-thick AGNs account for approximately half the number and luminosity density of the obscured population, and of the total. We also find evidence that the evolution is obscuration dependent, with the strongest evolution around N H ≈ 10 23 cm −2 . We highlight this by measuring the obscured fraction in Compton-thin AGNs, which increases toward z ∼ 3, where it is 25% higher than the local value. In contrast, the fraction of Compton-thick AGNs is consistent with being constant at ≈35%, independent of redshift and accretion luminosity. We discuss our findings in the context of existing models and conclude that the observed evolution is, to first order, a side effect of anti-hierarchical growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/802/2/89

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Brightman, M., Menzel, M.-L., Liu, Z., Hsu, L.-T., Salvato, M., Rangel, C., Aird, J., Merloni, A., & Ross, N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-03-27
Volume
802
Issue
2
Pages
89
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1971781650
Cited by
305
References
0
FWCI
20.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OBSCURATION-DEPENDENT EVOLUTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/802/2/89
The paper
Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Brightman, M., Menzel, M.-L., Liu, Z., Hsu, L.-T., Salvato, M., Rangel, C., Aird, J., Merloni, A., & Ross, N. (2015). OBSCURATION-DEPENDENT EVOLUTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/802/2/89

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.