Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SPITZER SECONDARY ECLIPSES OF THE DENSE, MODESTLY-IRRADIATED, GIANT EXOPLANET HAT-P-$20{\rm b}$ USING PIXEL-LEVEL DECORRELATION

Open access
Deming, Drake, Knutson, Heather, Kammer, Joshua, Fulton, Benjamin J., Ingalls, James, Carey, Sean, Burrows, Adam, Fortney, Jonathan J., Todorov, Kamen, Agol, Eric, Cowan, Nicolas, Desert, Jean-Michel, Fraine, Jonathan, Langton, Jonathan, Morley, Caroline, Showman, Adam P.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

HAT-P-20b is a giant metal-rich exoplanet orbiting a metal-rich star. We analyze two secondary eclipses of the planet in each of the 3.6 and 4.5 μ m bands of Warm Spitzer . We have developed a simple, powerful, and radically different method to correct the intra-pixel effect for Warm Spitzer data, which we call pixel-level decorrelation (PLD). PLD corrects the intra-pixel effect very effectively, but without explicitly using—or even measuring—the fluctuations in the apparent position of the stellar image. We illustrate and validate PLD using synthetic and real data and comparing the results to previous analyses. PLD can significantly reduce or eliminate red noise in Spitzer secondary eclipse photometry, even for eclipses that have proven to be intractable using other methods. Our successful PLD analysis of four HAT-P-20b eclipses shows a best-fit blackbody temperature of 1134 ± 29 K, indicating inefficient longitudinal transfer of heat, but lacking evidence for strong molecular absorption. We find sufficient evidence for variability in the 4.5 μ m band that the eclipses should be monitored at that wavelength by Spitzer , and this planet should be a high priority for James Webb Space Telescope spectroscopy. All four eclipses occur about 35 minutes after orbital phase 0.5, indicating a slightly eccentric orbit. A joint fit of the eclipse and transit times with extant RV data yields and establishes the small eccentricity of the orbit to high statistical confidence. HAT-P-20b is another excellent candidate for orbital evolution via Kozai migration or other three-body mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/132

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Deming, D., Knutson, H., Kammer, J., Fulton, B. J., Ingalls, J., Carey, S., Burrows, A., Fortney, J. J., Todorov, K., Agol, E., Cowan, N., Desert, J.-M., Fraine, J., Langton, J., Morley, C., & Showman, A. P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-05-28
Volume
805
Issue
2
Pages
132
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1955653533
Cited by
274
References
47
FWCI
17.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPITZER SECONDARY ECLIPSES OF THE DENSE, MODESTLY-IRRADIATED, GIANT EXOPLANET HAT-P-$20{\rm b}$ USING PIXEL-LEVEL DECORRELATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/132
The paper
Deming, D., Knutson, H., Kammer, J., Fulton, B. J., Ingalls, J., Carey, S., Burrows, A., Fortney, J. J., Todorov, K., Agol, E., Cowan, N., Desert, J.-M., Fraine, J., Langton, J., Morley, C., & Showman, A. P. (2015). SPITZER SECONDARY ECLIPSES OF THE DENSE, MODESTLY-IRRADIATED, GIANT EXOPLANET HAT-P-$20{\rm b}$ USING PIXEL-LEVEL DECORRELATION. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/132

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.