The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the Uncertainty in the Orbits of Extrasolar Planets
Open accessAbstract
Precise radial velocity measurements have led to the discovery of ∼100 extrasolar planetary systems. We investigate the uncertainty in the orbital solutions that have been fitted to these observations. Understanding these uncertainties will become more and more important as the discovery space for extrasolar planets shifts to longer and longer periods. While detections of short-period planets can be rapidly refined, planets with long orbital periods will require observations spanning decades to constrain the orbital parameters precisely. Already in some cases, multiple distinct orbital solutions provide similarly good fits, particularly in multiple-planet systems. We present a method for quantifying the uncertainties in orbital fits and addressing specific questions directly from the observational data rather than relying on best-fit orbital solutions. This Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique has the advantage that it is well suited to the high-dimensional parameter spaces necessary for the multiple-planet systems. We apply the MCMC technique to several extrasolar planetary systems, assessing the uncertainties in orbital elements for several systems. Our MCMC simulations demonstrate that for some systems there are strong correlations between orbital parameters and/or significant non-Gaussianities in parameter distributions, even though the measurement errors are nearly Gaussian. Once these effects are considered, the actual uncertainties in orbital elements can be significantly larger or smaller than the published uncertainties. We also present simple applications of our methods, such as predicting the times of possible transits for GJ 876.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Cited by
Cumming, A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Vogt, S. S., Wright, J. T., & Fischer, D. A. (2008) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/588487 · Cited by 892
THE HAWAII INFRARED PARALLAX PROGRAM. I. ULTRACOOL BINARIES AND THE L/T TRANSITION ,
Dupuy, T. J., & Liu, M. C. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/19 · Cited by 573
KEPLER'S FIRST ROCKY PLANET: KEPLER-10b
Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Ciardi, D., Dunham, E. W., Fressin, F., Gautier, T. N., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/1/27 · Cited by 531
Self-citationThompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9 · Cited by 429
Self-citationDeming, D., Knutson, H., Kammer, J., Fulton, B. J., Ingalls, J., Carey, S., Burrows, A., Fortney, J. J., Todorov, K., Agol, E., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/132 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, E. B.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1706-1717
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2079765438
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Uncertainty in the Orbits of Extrasolar Planets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/427962
- The paper
- Ford, E. B. (2005). Quantifying the Uncertainty in the Orbits of Extrasolar Planets. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/427962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.