The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AS A PHYSICAL HALO BOUNDARY AND THE GROWTH OF HALO MASS
Open accessAbstract
The boundaries of cold dark matter halos are commonly defined to enclose a density contrast Δ relative to a reference (mean or critical) density. We argue that a more physical halo boundary choice is the radius at which accreted matter reaches its first orbital apocenter after turnaround. This splashback radius , , manifests itself as a sharp density drop in the halo outskirts, at a location that depends upon the mass accretion rate. We present calibrations of and the enclosed mass, , as a function of mass accretion rate and peak height. We find that is in the range for rapidly accreting halos and is for slowly accreting halos. Thus, halos and their environmental effects can extend well beyond the conventionally defined "virial" radius. We show that and evolve relatively strongly compared to other commonly used definitions. In particular, evolves significantly even for the smallest dwarf-sized halos at z = 0. We also contrast with the mass enclosed within four scale radii of the halo density profile, , which characterizes the inner halo. During the early stages of halo assembly, and evolve similarly, but in the late stages stops increasing while continues to grow significantly. This illustrates that halos at low z can have "quiet" interiors while continuing to accrete mass in their outskirts. We discuss potential observational estimates of the splashback radius and show that it may already have been detected in galaxy clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. (1978) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · Cited by 3,919
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
COLOSSUS: A Python Toolkit for Cosmology, Large-scale Structure, and Dark Matter Halos
Diemer, B. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaee8c · Cited by 494
Self-citationThe cosmic baryon cycle and galaxy mass assembly in the FIRE simulations
Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Kereš, D., Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1517 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- More, S., Diemer, B., & Kravtsov, A. V.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2015-08-27
- Volume
- 810
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1857637982
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AS A PHYSICAL HALO BOUNDARY AND THE GROWTH OF HALO MASS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/36
- The paper
- More, S., Diemer, B., & Kravtsov, A. V. (2015). THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AS A PHYSICAL HALO BOUNDARY AND THE GROWTH OF HALO MASS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.