The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT, THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, AND ANOMALIES: CONCLUSIONS FROM 20 YEARS OF TeV GAMMA-RAY OBSERVATIONS
Open accessAbstract
Ground-based observatories have been collecting 0.2–20 TeV gamma-rays from blazars for about twenty years. These gamma-rays can experience absorption along the line of sight due to interactions with the extragalactic background light (EBL). In this paper, we show that the gamma-ray optical depth can be reduced to the convolution product of an EBL kernel with the EBL intensity, assuming a particular form for the EBL evolution. We extract the absorption signal from the most extensive set of TeV spectra from blazars collected so far and unveil a broadband EBL spectrum from mid-ultraviolet to far-infrared. This spectrum is in good agreement with the accumulated emission of galaxies, constraining unresolved populations of sources. We propose a data-driven estimate of the Hubble constant based on the comparison of local and gamma-ray measurements of the EBL. After setting stringent upper-limits on the redshift of four TeV blazars, we investigate the 106 gamma-ray spectra in our sample and find no significant evidence for anomalies. The intrinsic TeV spectra are not harder than their GeV counterpart, and no spectral upturn is visible at the highest optical depths. Finally, we investigate a modification of the pair-creation threshold due to Lorentz invariance violation. A mild excess prevents us from ruling out an effect at the Planck energy, and we constrain for the first time the energy scale of the modification to values larger than 60% of the Planck energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amelino-Camelia, G., & Piran, T. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.036005 · Cited by 375
A strong astrophysical constraint on the violation of special relativity by quantum gravity
Jacobson, T., Liberati, S., & Mattingly, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01882 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review
Addazi, A., Alvarez-Muniz, J., Alves Batista, R., Amelino-Camelia, G., Antonelli, V., Arzano, M., Asorey, M., Atteia, J.-L., Bahamonde, S., Bajardi, F., et al. (2022) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103948 · Cited by 440
The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and design
Álvarez-Muñiz, J., Alves Batista, R., Balagopal V., A., Bolmont, J., Bustamante, M., Carvalho, W., Charrier, D., Cognard, I., Decoene, V., Denton, P. B., et al. (2020) · Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9385-7 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Biteau, J., & Williams, D. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2015-10-09
- Volume
- 812
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1899042772
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT, THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, AND ANOMALIES: CONCLUSIONS FROM 20 YEARS OF TeV GAMMA-RAY OBSERVATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/60
- The paper
- Biteau, J., & Williams, D. A. (2015). THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT, THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, AND ANOMALIES: CONCLUSIONS FROM 20 YEARS OF TeV GAMMA-RAY OBSERVATIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.