Cited by 277Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaRelativity and Gravitational Theory

A strong astrophysical constraint on the violation of special relativity by quantum gravity

Open access
Jacobson, T., Liberati, S., Mattingly, D.·2003·Nature

Abstract

Special relativity asserts that physical phenomena appear the same to all unaccelerated observers. This is called Lorentz symmetry and relates long wavelengths to short ones: if the symmetry is exact it implies that space-time must look the same at all length scales. Several approaches to quantum gravity, however, suggest that there may be a microscopic structure of space-time that leads to a violation of Lorentz symmetry. This might arise because of the discreteness or non-commutivity of space-time, or through the action of extra dimensions. Here we determine a very strong constraint on a type of Lorentz violation that produces a maximum electron speed less than the speed of light. We use the observation of 100-MeV synchrotron radiation from the Crab nebula to improve the previous limit by a factor of 40 million, ruling out this type of Lorentz violation, and thereby providing an important constraint on theories of quantum gravity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature01882

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchrotron emission from the Crab nebula (and other astrophysical objects) is very sensitive to n = 3 modified dispersion relations.

    “Jacobson et al. [153] noticed that the synchrotron emission from the Crab nebula (and other astrophysical objects) is very sensitive to n = 3 modified dispersion relations.”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [153]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobson, T., Liberati, S., & Mattingly, D.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2003-08
Volume
424
Issue
6952
Pages
1019-1021
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2055012568
Cited by
277
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Lorentz violation, quantum gravity, special relativity, synchrotron radiation, Crab Nebula, noncommutative spacetime, extra dimensions, astrophysical constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review