The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy of finite tissue volumes using diffusion theory
Open accessAbstract
The goal of frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy is the non-invasive determination of the absorption coefficient of a specific tissue volume. Since this allows the concentration of endogenous and exogenous chromophores to be calculated, there is considerable potential for clinical application. The technique relies on the measurement of the phase and modulation of light, which is diffusely reflected or transmitted by the tissue when it is illuminated by an intensity-modulated source. A model of light propagation must then be used to deduce the absorption coefficient. For simplicity, it is usual to assume the tissue is either infinite in extent (for transmission measurements) or semi-infinite (for reflectance measurements). The goal of this paper is to examine the errors introduced by these assumptions when measurements are actually performed on finite volumes. Diffusion-theory calculations and experimental measurements were performed for slabs, cylinders and spheres with optical properties characteristic of soft tissues in the near infrared. The error in absorption coefficient is presented as a function of object size as a guideline to when the simple models may be used. For transmission measurements, the error is almost independent of the true absorption coefficient, which allows absolute changes in absorption to be measured accurately. The implications of these errors in absorption coefficient for two clinical problems--quantitation of an exogenous photosensitizer and measurement of haemoglobin oxygenation--are presented and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of the optical properties of biological tissues
Cheong, W. F., Prahl, S. A., & Welch, A. J. (1990) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.64354 · Cited by 2,530
Cited by
Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography
Durduran, T., Choe, R., Baker, W. B., & Yodh, A. G. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/7/076701 · Cited by 1,161
Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography
Boas, D. A., Brooks, D. H., Miller, E. L., DiMarzio, C. A., Kilmer, M., Gaudette, R. J., & Zhang, Q. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962278 · Cited by 718
Kienle, A., & Patterson, M. S. (1997) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.14.000246 · Cited by 474
Self-citationDuncan, A., Meek, J. H., Clemence, M., Elwell, C. E., Fallon, P., Tyszczuk, L., Cope, M., & Delpy, D. T. (1996) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/00006450-199605000-00025 · Cited by 469
A review of in‐vivo optical properties of human tissues and its impact on PDT
Sandell, J. L., & Zhu, T. C. (2011) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.201100062 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Pogue, B. W., & Patterson, M. S.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1157-1180
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2028902382
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy of finite tissue volumes using diffusion theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/39/7/008
- The paper
- Pogue, B. W., & Patterson, M. S. (1994). Frequency-domain optical absorption spectroscopy of finite tissue volumes using diffusion theory. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/39/7/008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.