The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theoretical comparison of energy sources - microwave, ultrasound and laser - for interstitial thermal therapy
Open accessAbstract
A number of heating sources are available for minimally invasive thermal therapy of tumours. The purpose of this work was to compare, theoretically, the heating characteristics of interstitial microwave, laser and ultrasound sources in three tissue sites: breast, brain and liver. Using a numerical method, the heating patterns, temperature profiles and expected volumes of thermal damage were calculated during standard treatment times with the condition that tissue temperatures were not permitted to rise above 100 degrees C (to ensure tissue vaporization did not occur). Ideal spherical and cylindrical applicators (200 microm and 800 microm radii respectively) were modelled for each energy source to demonstrate the relative importance of geometry and energy attenuation in determining heating and thermal damage profiles. The theoretical model included the effects of the collapse of perfusion due to heating. Heating patterns were less dependent on the energy source when small spherical applicators were modelled than for larger cylindrical applicators due to the very rapid geometrical decrease in energy with distance for the spherical applicators. For larger cylindrical applicators, the energy source was of greater importance. In this case, the energy source with the lowest attenuation coefficient was predicted to produce the largest volume of thermally coagulated tissue, in each tissue site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of the optical properties of biological tissues
Cheong, W. F., Prahl, S. A., & Welch, A. J. (1990) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.64354 · Cited by 2,530
Cited by
Principles of and Advances in Percutaneous Ablation
Ahmed, M., Brace, C. L., Lee, F. T., & Goldberg, S. N. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.10081634 · Cited by 916
Microwave Tumor Ablation: Mechanism of Action, Clinical Results, and Devices
Lubner, M. G., Brace, C. L., Hinshaw, J. L., & Lee, F. T. (2010) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.007 · Cited by 765
Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation in Liver Tumors: An Update
Izzo, F., Granata, V., Grassi, R., Fusco, R., Palaia, R., Delrio, P., Carrafiello, G., Azoulay, D., Petrillo, A., & Curley, S. A. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0337 · Cited by 578
Microwave Ablation of Lung Malignancies: Effectiveness, CT Findings, and Safety in 50 Patients
Wolf, F. J., Grand, D. J., Machan, J. T., DiPetrillo, T. A., Mayo-Smith, W. W., & Dupuy, D. E. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2473070996 · Cited by 398
Mechanisms of Focal Heat Destruction of Liver Tumors
Nikfarjam, M., Muralidharan, V., & Christophi, C. (2005) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2005.02.009 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Skinner, M. G., Iizuka, M. N., Kolios, M. C., & Sherar, M. D.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3535-3547
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1994368688
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theoretical comparison of energy sources - microwave, ultrasound and laser - for interstitial thermal therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/43/12/011
- The paper
- Skinner, M. G., Iizuka, M. N., Kolios, M. C., & Sherar, M. D. (1998). A theoretical comparison of energy sources - microwave, ultrasound and laser - for interstitial thermal therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/43/12/011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.