The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner
Open accessAbstract
A Bayesian method is described for reconstruction of high-resolution 3D images from the microPET small-animal scanner. Resolution recovery is achieved by explicitly modelling the depth dependent geometric sensitivity for each voxel in combination with an accurate detector response model that includes factors due to photon pair non-collinearity and inter-crystal scatter and penetration. To reduce storage and computational costs we use a factored matrix in which the detector response is modelled using a sinogram blurring kernel. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) images are reconstructed using this model in combination with a Poisson likelihood function and a Gibbs prior on the image. Reconstructions obtained from point source data using the accurate system model demonstrate a potential for near-isotropic FWHM resolution of approximately 1.2 mm at the center of the field of view compared with approximately 2 mm when using an analytic 3D reprojection (3DRP) method with a ramp filter. These results also show the ability of the accurate system model to compensate for resolution loss due to crystal penetration producing nearly constant radial FWHM resolution of 1 mm out to a 4 mm radius. Studies with a point source in a uniform cylinder indicate that as the resolution of the image is reduced to control noise propagation the resolution obtained using the accurate system model is superior to that obtained using 3DRP at matched background noise levels. Additional studies using pie phantoms with hot and cold cylinders of diameter 1-2.5 mm and 18FDG animal studies appear to confirm this observation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis
Loening, A. M., & Gambhir, S. S. (2003) · Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1162/15353500200303133 · Cited by 1,018
Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements
Panin, V. Y., Kehren, F., Michel, C., & Casey, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.876171 · Cited by 536
Gambhir, S. S., Bauer, E., Black, M. E., Liang, Q., Kokoris, M. S., Barrio, J. R., Iyer, M., Namavari, M., Phelps, M. E., & Herschman, H. R. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.6.2785 · Cited by 450
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 395
Imaging Transgene Expression with Radionuclide Imaging Technologies
Gambhir, S. S., Herschman, H. R., Cherry, S. R., Barrio, J. R., Satyamurthy, N., Toyokuni, T., Phelps, M. E., Larson, S. M., Balatoni, J., Finn, R., et al. (2000) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900083 · Cited by 358
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Qi, J., Leahy, R. M., Cherry, S. R., Chatziioannou, A., & Farquhar, T. H.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1001-1013
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2084090004
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/43/4/027
- The paper
- Qi, J., Leahy, R. M., Cherry, S. R., Chatziioannou, A., & Farquhar, T. H. (1998). High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/43/4/027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.