The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution
Abstract
Developments in positron emission tomography (PET) technology have resulted in systems with finer detector elements designed to further improve spatial resolution. However, there is a limit to what extent reducing detector element size will improve spatial resolution in PET. The spatial resolution of PET imaging is limited by several other factors, such as annihilation photon non-collinearity, positron range, off-axis detector penetration, detector Compton scatter, undersampling of the signal in the linear or angular directions for the image reconstruction process, and patient motion. The overall spatial resolution of the systems is a convolution of these components. Of these other factors that contribute to resolution broadening, perhaps the most uncertain, poorly understood, and, for certain isotopes, the most dominant effect is from positron range. To study this latter effect we have developed a Monte Carlo simulation code that models positron trajectories and calculates the distribution of the end point coordinates in water for the most common PET isotopes used: 18F, 13N, 11C and 15O. In this work we present some results from these positron trajectory studies and calculate what effect positron range has on the overall PET system spatial resolution, and how this influences the choice of PET system design parameters such as detector element size and system diameter. We found that the fundamental PET system spatial resolution limit set from detector size, photon non-collinearity and positron range alone varied from nearly 1 mm FWHM (2 mm FWTM) for a 10-20 cm diameter system typical for animal studies with 18F to roughly 4 mm FWHM (7 mm FWTM) for an 80 cm diameter system typical for human imaging using 15O.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yang, Y., & Raine, A. (2009) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.03.012 · Cited by 888
PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges
Rahmim, A., & Zaidi, H. (2008) · Nuclear Medicine Communications · doi:10.1097/mnm.0b013e3282f3a515 · Cited by 834
In vivo molecular and genomic imaging: new challenges for imaging physics
Cherry, S. R. (2004) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/3/r01 · Cited by 334
Lehnert, W., Gregoire, M.-C., Reilhac, A., & Meikle, S. R. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.032 · Cited by 52
Risk Factors Associated with Canine Heartworm Infection
Selby, L. A., Corwin, R. M., & Hayes, H. M. (1980) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.1980.176.01.33 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, C. S., & Hoffman, E. J.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 781-799
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1981425552
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/44/3/019
- The paper
- Levin, C. S., & Hoffman, E. J. (1999). Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/3/019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.