Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 610

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy

Open access
Wang, He, Dong, Lei, O'Daniel, Jennifer, Mohan, Radhe, Garden, Adam S, Ang, K Kian, Kuban, Deborah A, Bonnen, Mark, Chang, Joe Y, Cheung, Rex·2005·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

A greyscale-based fully automatic deformable image registration algorithm, originally known as the 'demons' algorithm, was implemented for CT image-guided radiotherapy. We accelerated the algorithm by introducing an 'active force' along with an adaptive force strength adjustment during the iterative process. These improvements led to a 40% speed improvement over the original algorithm and a high tolerance of large organ deformations. We used three methods to evaluate the accuracy of the algorithm. First, we created a set of mathematical transformations for a series of patient's CT images. This provides a 'ground truth' solution for quantitatively validating the deformable image registration algorithm. Second, we used a physically deformable pelvic phantom, which can measure deformed objects under different conditions. The results of these two tests allowed us to quantify the accuracy of the deformable registration. Validation results showed that more than 96% of the voxels were within 2 mm of their intended shifts for a prostate and a head-and-neck patient case. The mean errors and standard deviations were 0.5 mm+/-1.5 mm and 0.2 mm+/-0.6 mm, respectively. Using the deformable pelvis phantom, the result showed a tracking accuracy of better than 1.5 mm for 23 seeds implanted in a phantom prostate that was deformed by inflation of a rectal balloon. Third, physician-drawn contours outlining the tumour volumes and certain anatomical structures in the original CT images were deformed along with the CT images acquired during subsequent treatments or during a different respiratory phase for a lung cancer case. Visual inspection of the positions and shapes of these deformed contours agreed well with human judgment. Together, these results suggest that the accelerated demons algorithm has significant potential for delineating and tracking doses in targets and critical structures during CT-guided radiotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 610

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Dong, L., O'Daniel, J., Mohan, R., Garden, A. S., Ang, K. K., Kuban, D. A., Bonnen, M., Chang, J. Y., & Cheung, R.
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
2887-2905
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W1990885164
Cited by
610
References
2
FWCI
26.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011
The paper
Wang, H., Dong, L., O'Daniel, J., Mohan, R., Garden, A. S., Ang, K. K., Kuban, D. A., Bonnen, M., Chang, J. Y., & Cheung, R. (2005). Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.