The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy
Open accessAbstract
A greyscale-based fully automatic deformable image registration algorithm, originally known as the 'demons' algorithm, was implemented for CT image-guided radiotherapy. We accelerated the algorithm by introducing an 'active force' along with an adaptive force strength adjustment during the iterative process. These improvements led to a 40% speed improvement over the original algorithm and a high tolerance of large organ deformations. We used three methods to evaluate the accuracy of the algorithm. First, we created a set of mathematical transformations for a series of patient's CT images. This provides a 'ground truth' solution for quantitatively validating the deformable image registration algorithm. Second, we used a physically deformable pelvic phantom, which can measure deformed objects under different conditions. The results of these two tests allowed us to quantify the accuracy of the deformable registration. Validation results showed that more than 96% of the voxels were within 2 mm of their intended shifts for a prostate and a head-and-neck patient case. The mean errors and standard deviations were 0.5 mm+/-1.5 mm and 0.2 mm+/-0.6 mm, respectively. Using the deformable pelvis phantom, the result showed a tracking accuracy of better than 1.5 mm for 23 seeds implanted in a phantom prostate that was deformed by inflation of a rectal balloon. Third, physician-drawn contours outlining the tumour volumes and certain anatomical structures in the original CT images were deformed along with the CT images acquired during subsequent treatments or during a different respiratory phase for a lung cancer case. Visual inspection of the positions and shapes of these deformed contours agreed well with human judgment. Together, these results suggest that the accelerated demons algorithm has significant potential for delineating and tracking doses in targets and critical structures during CT-guided radiotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · Cited by 8,676
Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons
Thirion, J.-P. (1998) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(98)80022-4 · Cited by 2,445
Cited by
Brock, K. K., Mutic, S., McNutt, T. R., Li, H., & Kessler, M. L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12256 · Cited by 881
Implementation and evaluation of various demons deformable image registration algorithms on a GPU
Gu, X., Pan, H., Liang, Y., Castillo, R., Yang, D., Choi, D., Castillo, E., Majumdar, A., Guerrero, T., & Jiang, S. B. (2010) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/012 · Cited by 243
Fast Deformable Registration on the GPU: A CUDA Implementation of Demons
Muyan-Ozcelik, P., Owens, J. D., Xia, J., & Samant, S. S. (2008) · 2008 International Conference on Computational Sciences and Its Applications · doi:10.1109/iccsa.2008.22 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Dong, L., O'Daniel, J., Mohan, R., Garden, A. S., Ang, K. K., Kuban, D. A., Bonnen, M., Chang, J. Y., & Cheung, R.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2887-2905
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1990885164
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011
- The paper
- Wang, H., Dong, L., O'Daniel, J., Mohan, R., Garden, A. S., Ang, K. K., Kuban, D. A., Bonnen, M., Chang, J. Y., & Cheung, R. (2005). Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.