The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Targeted disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity
Abstract
Acoustic emission was monitored during focused ultrasound exposures in conjunction with an ultrasound contrast agent (Optison) in order to determine if cavitation activity is associated with the induction of blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Thirty-four locations were sonicated (frequency: 260 kHz) at targets 10 mm deep in rabbit brain (N = 9). The sonications were applied at peak pressure amplitudes ranging from 0.11 to 0.57 MPa (burst length: 10 ms; repetition frequency of 1 Hz; duration: 20 s). Acoustic emission was recorded with a focused passive cavitation detector. This emission was recorded at each location during sonications with and without Optison. Detectable wideband acoustic emission was observed only at 0.40 and 0.57 MPa. BBBD was observed in contrast MRI after sonication at 0.29-0.57 MPa. The appearance of small regions of extravasated erythrocytes appeared to be associated with this wideband emission signal. The results thus suggest that BBBD resulting from focused ultrasound pulses in the presence of Optison can occur without indicators for inertial cavitation in vivo, wideband emission and extravasation. If inertial cavitation is not responsible for the BBBD, other ultrasound/microbubble interactions are likely the source. A significant increase in the emission signal due to Optison at the second and third harmonics of the ultrasound driving frequency was found to correlate with BBBD and might be useful as an online method to indicate when the disruption occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Blood-Brain Barrier and Cancer: Transporters, Treatment, and Trojan Horses
Deeken, J. F., & Löscher, W. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2854 · Cited by 721
Applications of Acoustics and Cavitation to Noninvasive Therapy and Drug Delivery
Coussios, C. C., & Roy, R. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102116 · Cited by 532
O’Reilly, M. A., & Hynynen, K. (2012) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11111417 · Cited by 401
Self-citationUltrasound-Responsive Cavitation Nuclei for Therapy and Drug Delivery
Kooiman, K., Roovers, S., Langeveld, S. A. G., Kleven, R. T., Dewitte, H., O'Reilly, M. A., Escoffre, J.-M., Bouakaz, A., Verweij, M. D., Hynynen, K., et al. (2020) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.01.002 · Cited by 359
Self-citationJordão, J. F., Thévenot, E., Markham-Coultes, K., Scarcelli, T., Weng, Y.-Q., Xhima, K., O'Reilly, M., Huang, Y., McLaurin, J., Hynynen, K., et al. (2013) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 326
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Hynynen, K.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-01-25
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 793-807
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2030106926
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/003
- The paper
- McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Hynynen, K. (2006). Targeted disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.