The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements
Abstract
Limitations of traditional magnetoencephalography (MEG) exclude some important patient groups from MEG examinations, such as epilepsy patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, patients with magnetic particles on the head or having magnetic dental materials that cause severe movement-related artefact signals. Conventional interference rejection methods are not able to remove the artefacts originating this close to the MEG sensor array. For example, the reference array method is unable to suppress interference generated by sources closer to the sensors than the reference array, about 20-40 cm. The spatiotemporal signal space separation method proposed in this paper recognizes and removes both external interference and the artefacts produced by these nearby sources, even on the scalp. First, the basic separation into brain-related and external interference signals is accomplished with signal space separation based on sensor geometry and Maxwell's equations only. After this, the artefacts from nearby sources are extracted by a simple statistical analysis in the time domain, and projected out. Practical examples with artificial current dipoles and interference sources as well as data from real patients demonstrate that the method removes the artefacts without altering the field patterns of the brain signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Signal Processing in Magnetoencephalography
Vrba, J., & Robinson, S. E. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1238 · Cited by 716
Cited by
Cichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27755 · Cited by 716
Neural Mechanisms of Object-Based Attention
Baldauf, D., & Desimone, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247003 · Cited by 536
Broadband criticality of human brain network synchronization
Kitzbichler, M. G., Smith, M. L., Christensen, S. R., & Bullmore, E. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000314 · Cited by 527
Brookes, M. J., Leggett, J., Rea, M., Hill, R. M., Holmes, N., Boto, E., & Bowtell, R. (2022) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2022.05.008 · Cited by 412
MEG: An Introduction to Methods
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307238.001.0001 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Taulu, S., & Simola, J.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-03-16
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1759-1768
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1967125431
- Cited by
- 1,549
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008
- The paper
- Taulu, S., & Simola, J. (2006). Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.