Cited by 327Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications

Parallel magnetic resonance imaging

Larkman, David J, Nunes, Rita G·2007·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Parallel imaging has been the single biggest innovation in magnetic resonance imaging in the last decade. The use of multiple receiver coils to augment the time consuming Fourier encoding has reduced acquisition times significantly. This increase in speed comes at a time when other approaches to acquisition time reduction were reaching engineering and human limits. A brief summary of spatial encoding in MRI is followed by an introduction to the problem parallel imaging is designed to solve. There are a large number of parallel reconstruction algorithms; this article reviews a cross-section, SENSE, SMASH, g-SMASH and GRAPPA, selected to demonstrate the different approaches. Theoretical (the g-factor) and practical (coil design) limits to acquisition speed are reviewed. The practical implementation of parallel imaging is also discussed, in particular coil calibration. How to recognize potential failure modes and their associated artefacts are shown. Well-established applications including angiography, cardiac imaging and applications using echo planar imaging are reviewed and we discuss what makes a good application for parallel imaging. Finally, active research areas where parallel imaging is being used to improve data quality by repairing artefacted images are also reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/r01

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applying parallel imaging and SMS techniques to studies in the mouse brain is challenging due to the small coil size and limited space in the probe.

    “Applying these techniques to studies in the mouse brain is challenging due to the small coil size (supplemental figure 1) and the limited space in the probe (Johnson et al. 2012; Petiet et al. 2008; Larkman and Nunes 2007).”

    From Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of mouse brain microstructure (2019) · cites this paper as Larkman and Nunes 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larkman, D. J., & Nunes, R. G.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2007-03-09
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
R15-R55
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W4210583703
Cited by
327
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/C53820X/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Keywords
parallel MRI, parallel imaging, spatial coding, senses, smash, GRAPPA, general intelligence, coil design, coil calibration, artifacts, angiography, cardiac imaging, echo planar imaging, acquisition time reduction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Angiography, Brain, Calibration, Equipment Design, Fourier Analysis, Heart, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Models, Statistical, Artifacts, Echo-Planar Imaging, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review