The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective
Open accessAbstract
After 20 years of innovation in techniques that specifically image the biomechanical properties of tissue, the evolution of elastographic imaging can be viewed from its infancy, through a proliferation of approaches to the problem to incorporation on research and then clinical imaging platforms. Ultimately this activity has culminated in clinical trials and improved care for patients. This remarkable progression represents a leading example of translational research that begins with fundamentals of science and engineering and progresses to needed improvements in diagnostic and monitoring capabilities applied to major categories of disease, surgery and interventional procedures. This review summarizes the fundamental principles, the timeline of developments in major categories of elastographic imaging, and concludes with recent results from clinical trials and forward-looking issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial in vivo experience with steady‐state subzone‐based MR elastography of the human breast
Van Houten, E. E. W., Doyley, M. M., Kennedy, F. E., Weaver, J. B., & Paulsen, K. D. (2003) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.10232 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Cited by
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, K. J., Doyley, M. M., & Rubens, D. J.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-11-30
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R1-R29
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2017589027
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
