The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parity violation in atoms
Open accessAbstract
Optical experiments have demonstrated cases in which mirror symmetry in stable atoms is broken during the absorption or emission of light. Such results, which are in conflict with quantum electrodynamics, support the theory of unification of the electromagnetic and weak interactions. The interpretation of the experimental results is based on exchanges of weak neutral bosons between the electrons and the nucleus of the atom. A concise review of these phenomena in atomic physics is presented. The role of precise caesium parity-violation experiments, as a source of valuable information about electroweak physics, is illustrated by examples pertaining to experimental conditions which, in some cases, are not accessible to accelerator experiments. We give the basic principles of experiments, some under way and others completed, where a quantitative determination of the nuclear weak charge, , which plays for the exchange the same role as the electric charge for the Coulomb interaction is to be, or has been achieved. In the most recent and most precise experiment the accuracy on is limited to 1 % by the uncertainty due to atomic physics calculations. Such a result challenges specialists in atomic theory and nuclear structure, since a more accurate determination of would mean more stringent constraints upon possible extensions of the standard model. Moreover, clear evidence has recently been obtained for the existence of the nuclear anapole moment, which describes the valence electron interaction with a chiral nuclear-magnetization component induced by the parity-violating nuclear forces. In writing this review, our hope was to make clear that any improvement in atomic parity-violation measurements will allow the exploration of new areas of electroweak physics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parity violation has been observed in nuclear and atomic physics.
“Parity violation has been observed in nuclear 67 and atomic Physics.[74][75][76][77]”
From Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality (2022) · cites this paper as [75]
Citations
Cites
Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions
Lee, T. D., & Yang, C. N. (1956) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.104.254 · Cited by 2,412
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 134
- 10.1016/0029-554X(81)91179-4 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.nucl.35.1.501 · DOI
- Adloff C (H1 Collab.), 1997, Z. Phys., 74, 191, 10.1007/s002880050383 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(91)91341-R · DOI
- Arnison G (UA1 Collab.), 1983, Phys. Lett., 122B, 103, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91177-2 · DOI
- Arnison G (UA1 Collab.), 1983, Phys. Lett., 126B, 398, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90188-0 · DOI
- Avetisov V A, 1991, Physics Today, 44, 33, 10.1063/1.881264 · DOI
- Banner G (UA2 Collab.), 1983, Phys. Lett., 122B, 476, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91605-2 · DOI
- Barkov L M, 1989, Opt. Spectrosc. (USSR), 66, 288
- Barkov L M, 1980, Sov. Phys. - JETP, 52, 360
- 10.1016/0375-9601(86)90072-1 · DOI
- Barra A L, 1988, Europhys. Lett., 5, 217, 10.1209/0295-5075/5/3/006 · DOI
- 10.1109/3.469270 · DOI
- Birich G N, 1984, Sov. Phys. - JETP, 60, 442
- Blundell S A, 1991, Theor. Chim. Acta, 80, 257, 10.1007/BF01117413 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1411 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.45.1602 · DOI
- Bouchiat C, 1996, Z. Phys., 36, 105, 10.1007/BF01426624 · DOI
- Bouchiat C, 1983, Phys. Lett., 128B, 73, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90076-X · DOI
- Bouchiat C, 1986, Europhys. Lett., 2, 511, 10.1209/0295-5075/2/7/004 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(91)91474-A · DOI
- Bouchiat C, 1991, Z. Phys., 49, 49, 10.1007/BF01570800 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(74)90656-X · DOI · Paper page
- Bouchiat M A, 1974, J. Physique, 35, 899, 10.1051/jphys:019740035012089900 · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1975, J. Physique, 36, 493, 10.1051/jphys:01975003606049300 · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1988, J. Physique, 49, 2037, 10.1051/jphys:0198800490120203700 · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1986, Science, 234, 1203, 10.1126/science.234.4781.1203 · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1982, Phys. Lett., 117B, 358, 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90736-5 · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1984, Phys. Lett., 134B, 463, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91386-8 · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1986, J. Physique, 47, 1709, 10.1051/jphys:0198600470100170900 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-4018(90)90128-G · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1985, J. Physique, 46, 1897, 10.1051/jphys:0198500460110189700 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-4018(85)90210-X · DOI
- Bouchiat M A, 1979, J. Physique, 40, 1127, 10.1051/jphys:0197900400120112700 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.3103 · DOI
- Breitweg J (ZEUS Collab.), 1997, Z. Phys., 74, 207, 10.1007/s002880050384 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3019 · DOI
- Budker D, 1994, Phys. Lett., 50A, 132
- 10.1016/S0030-4018(97)00068-0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.48.1392 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.1007 · DOI
- Commins E D, 1987, Phys. Scr., 36, 468, 10.1088/0031-8949/36/3/015 · DOI
- Curtis-Michel F, 1965, Phys. Rev., 138, 408, 10.1103/PhysRev.138.B408 · DOI
- Davies I O G, 1989, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 22, 741, 10.1088/0953-4075/22/5/006 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4165 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.4657 · DOI
- Desplanques B, 1980, Ann. Physics, 124, 449, 10.1016/0003-4916(80)90217-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90940-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00440-X · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.968 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.32.2196 · DOI
- Dunford R W, 1981, Phys. Lett., 99B, 58, 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90803-0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.2949 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3820 · DOI
- Dzuba V A, 1986, Z. Phys., 1, 243, 10.1007/BF01436678 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.3812 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(89)90385-X · DOI
- Dzuba V A, 1987, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys., 20, 3297, 10.1088/0022-3700/20/14/005 · DOI
- Dzuba V A, 1988, Europhys. Lett., 7, 413, 10.1209/0295-5075/7/5/006 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(89)90777-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.3454 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2654 · DOI
- Fayet P, 1977, Phys. Lett., 69B, 489, 10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8 · DOI
- Fayet P, 1979, Phys. Lett., 84B, 416, 10.1016/0370-2693(79)91229-2 · DOI
- Fayet P, 1980, Phys. Lett., 96B, 83, 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90217-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91545-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90271-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90122-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90381-M · DOI
- Flambaum V V, 1980, Sov. Phys. - JETP, 52, 835
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1641 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.49.1827 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.51.1521 · DOI
- Flambaum V V, 1984, Phys. Lett., 146B, 367, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90140-0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2383 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2857 · DOI
- Frantsuzov P A, 1988, Z. Phys., 7, 297, 10.1007/BF01439798 · DOI
- Gajzago E, 1974, Atomki Közl. Suppl., 16, 177
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2680 · DOI
- 10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2 · DOI
- Guéna J, 1997, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 14, 271, 10.1364/JOSAB.14.000271 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3795 · DOI
- Hartley A C, 1990, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 23, 2649, 10.1088/0953-4075/23/15/029 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(73)90499-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.949 · DOI
- Hegstrom R, 1990, Sci. Am., 262, 98, 10.1038/scientificamerican0190-108 · DOI
- Hegstrom R A, 1989, J. Chem. Phys., 73, 2329, 10.1063/1.440383 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.374 · DOI
- Hollister J H, 1981, Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, 642
- Khriplovich I B, 1974, JETP Lett., 20, 315
- Kondepudi D K, 1985, Nature, 314, 438, 10.1038/314438a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90702-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90276-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.45.278 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.6.1188 · DOI
- Letokhov V S, 1975, Phys. Lett., 53A, 275, 10.1016/0375-9601(75)90064-X · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.607 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(75)90159-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(87)90583-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3791 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.994 · DOI
- Lucas D M, 1997, Phys. Rev.
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2784 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.29.75 · DOI
- Mason S F, 1984, Nature, 311, 19, 10.1038/311019a0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3442 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.16.844 · DOI
- Nguyen A T, 1997, Phys. Rev.
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.310 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.381 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.46.2587 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(72)90104-6 · DOI
- Prescott C Y, 1978, Phys. Lett., 77B, 347, 10.1016/0370-2693(78)90722-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0370-2693(79)91253-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(79)90647-9 · DOI
- Sandars P G H, 1987, Phys. Scr., 36, 904, 10.1088/0031-8949/36/6/006 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3522 · DOI
- Stacey D, 1992, Phys. Scr., 40, 15, 10.1088/0031-8949/1992/T40/002 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.48.1069 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3241 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(71)90395-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(71)90139-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.332 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2658 · DOI
- Warrington R B, 1993, Europhys. Lett., 24, 641, 10.1209/0295-5075/24/8/004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1738 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.275.5307.1759 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.105.1413 · DOI · Paper page
- Xiong X, 1990, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 23, 4329
- Zel'dovich Y B, 1957, Sov. Phys. - JETP, 6, 1184
- Zel'dovich Y B, 1959, Sov. Phys. - JETP, 9, 682
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4169 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4717 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality
Sallembien, Q., Bouteiller, L., Crassous, J., & Raynal, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs01179k · Cited by 186
Biomolecular Homochirality and Electroweak Interactions. I. The Yamagata Hypothesis
Wesendrup, R., Laerdahl, J. K., Compton, R. N., & Schwerdtfeger, P. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp022568v · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouchiat, M.-A., & Bouchiat, C.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (FR)
- École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1351-1396
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2069090068
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
- Keywords
- atomic parity violation, mirror symmetry breaking, cesium atoms, electroweak physics, nuclear anapole moment, beyond the Standard Model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review