Cited by 2,225Nuclear physics research studiesRadioactive Decay and Measurement TechniquesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay

Open access
Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., Hudson, R. P.·1957·Physical Review

Abstract

The branching ratio of the two modes of decay of Fm'", i.e. , E.C. /n, was found to be about 8.5which gives 89.5% decay by electron capture and 10.5% by alpha emission.It was not possible to measure the cross section for the Cf'"(n, 3n)Fm'" reaction because Fm'" could also be produced from other californium isotopes in the target.A previous publication4 on a possible identification of the Fm'" gave the values of 6.85&0.04Mev for the alpha-particle energy, and a half-life &10 days.It is a pleasure to thank the crew of the 60-inch cyclotron for their extremely careful and skillful operation of the machine during the bombardment.We wish to thank

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.105.1413

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wu experimentally demonstrated that parity symmetry is broken in weak forces by showing that the transformation of unstable 60Co nuclei into 60Ni through beta-decay emits electrons of only left-handedness.

    “A few months later, Wu experimentally demonstrated that the parity symmetry is indeed broken in weak forces (which are hereby parity-odd), 67 by showing that the transformation of unstable 60 Co nuclei into 60 Ni, through the b À -decay of a neutron into a proton, emits electrons of only left-handedness.”
  • Parity violation has been observed in nuclear and atomic physics.

    “Parity violation has been observed in nuclear 67 and atomic Physics.[74][75][76][77]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., & Hudson, R. P.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1957-02-15
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
1413-1415
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2229720163
Cited by
2,225
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 50
FWCI
58.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Physical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
parity conservation, beta decay, electron capture, alpha decay, branching ratios, californium-252, nuclear reaction cross sections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review