The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of the spin bath
Open accessAbstract
The quantum dynamics of mesoscopic or macroscopic systems is always complicated by their coupling to many `environmental' modes. At low T these environmental effects are dominated by localized modes, such as nuclear and paramagnetic spins, and defects (which also dominate the entropy and specific heat). This environment, at low energies, maps onto a `spin bath' model. This contrasts with `oscillator bath' models (originated by Feynman and Vernon) which describe delocalized environmental modes such as electrons, phonons, photons, magnons, etc. The couplings to N spin bath modes are independent of N (rather than the ~O(1/( N ) 1/2 ) dependence typical of oscillator baths), and often strong. One cannot in general map a spin bath to an oscillator bath (or vice versa); they constitute distinct `universality classes' of quantum environment. We show how the mapping to spin bath models is made, and then discuss several examples in detail, including moving particles, magnetic solitons, nanomagnets, and SQUIDs, coupled to nuclear and paramagnetic spin environments. We then focus on the `central spin' model, which couples a central two-level system to a background spin bath. It is the spin bath analogue of the famous `spin-boson' oscillator model, and describes, e.g., the tunnelling dynamics of nanoscopic and mesoscopic magnets and superconductors. We show how to average over (or `integrate out') spin bath modes, using an operator instanton technique, to find the central spin dynamics. The formal manouevres involve four separate averages - each average corresponds physically to a different `decoherence' mechanism acting on the central spin dynamics. Each environmental spin has its own topological `spin phase', which by interacting with the phase of the central system, decoheres it - this can happen even without dissipation. We give analytic results for the central spin correlation functions, under various conditions. We then describe the application of this theory to magnetic and superconducting systems. Particular attention is given to recent work on tunnelling magnetic macromolecules, where the role of the nuclear spin bath in controlling the tunnelling is very clear; we also discuss other magnetic systems in the quantum regime, and the influence of nuclear and paramagnetic spins on flux dynamics in SQUIDs. Finally, we discuss decoherence mechanisms and coherence experiments in superconductors and magnets. We show that a spin bath environment causes decoherence even in the T 0 limit. Control of this decoherence will be essential in the effort to construct `qubits' for quantum computers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers
Hänggi, P., Talkner, P., & Borkovec, M. (1990) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.62.251 · Cited by 6,154
Gammaitoni, L., Hänggi, P., Jung, P., & Marchesoni, F. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.223 · Cited by 5,443
Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system
Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P. A., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1 · Cited by 5,109
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985
Random-matrix theory of quantum transport
Beenakker, C. W. J. (1997) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.69.731 · Cited by 2,551
Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement
Leggett, A. J. (1980) · Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · doi:10.1143/ptps.69.80 · Cited by 674
Cited by
Quantum Superposition of Macroscopic Persistent-Current States
van der Wal, C. H., ter Haar, A. C. J., Wilhelm, F. K., Schouten, R. N., Harmans, C. J. P. M., Orlando, T. P., Lloyd, S., & Mooij, J. E. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5492.773 · Cited by 985
Will Spin-Relaxation Times in Molecular Magnets Permit Quantum Information Processing?
Ardavan, A., Rival, O., Morton, J. J. L., Blundell, S. J., Tyryshkin, A. M., Timco, G. A., & Winpenny, R. E. P. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.057201 · Cited by 769
Coherent Dynamics of a Single Spin Interacting with an Adjustable Spin Bath
Hanson, R., Dobrovitski, V. V., Feiguin, A. E., Gywat, O., & Awschalom, D. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155400 · Cited by 454
Classical and Quantum Magnetization Reversal Studied in Nanometer‐Sized Particles and Clusters
Wernsdorfer, W. (2001) · Advances in Chemical Physics · doi:10.1002/9780470141786.ch3 · Cited by 331
Wernsdorfer, W. (2007) · Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials · doi:10.1002/9780470022184.hmm427 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Prokof'ev, N. V., & Stamp, P. C. E.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2000-03-22
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 669-726
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W1969603864
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of the spin bath. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/63/4/204
- The paper
- Prokof'ev, N. V., & Stamp, P. C. E. (2000). Theory of the spin bath. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/63/4/204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.