The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
\mathcal{O}(N) methods in electronic structure calculations
Open accessAbstract
Linear-scaling methods, or O(N) methods, have computational and memory requirements which scale linearly with the number of atoms in the system, N, in contrast to standard approaches which scale with the cube of the number of atoms. These methods, which rely on the short-ranged nature of electronic structure, will allow accurate, ab initio simulations of systems of unprecedented size. The theory behind the locality of electronic structure is described and related to physical properties of systems to be modelled, along with a survey of recent developments in real-space methods which are important for efficient use of high-performance computers. The linear-scaling methods proposed to date can be divided into seven different areas, and the applicability, efficiency and advantages of the methods proposed in these areas are then discussed. The applications of linear-scaling methods, as well as the implementations available as computer programs, are considered. Finally, the prospects for and the challenges facing linear-scaling methods are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Tkatchenko, A., & Scheffler, M. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.073005 · Cited by 6,286
Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method
Ercolessi, F., & Adams, J. B. (1994) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 · Cited by 1,455
Cited by
Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1419 · Cited by 3,283
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Christensen, A. S., Kubař, T., Cui, Q., & Elstner, M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584 · Cited by 446
Self-assembled quantum dots in a nanowire system for quantum photonics
Heiss, M., Fontana, Y., Gustafsson, A., Wüst, G., Magen, C., O’Regan, D. D., Luo, J. W., Ketterer, B., Conesa-Boj, S., Kuhlmann, A. V., et al. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3557 · Cited by 339
Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods
Martin, R. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108555586 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowler, D. R., & Miyazaki, T.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-02-15
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 036503
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2950119333
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: \mathcal{O}(N) methods in electronic structure calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/75/3/036503
- The paper
- Bowler, D. R., & Miyazaki, T. (2012). \mathcal{O}(N) methods in electronic structure calculations. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/3/036503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.