The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei
Open accessAbstract
In the past decade, coupled-cluster theory has seen a renaissance in nuclear physics, with computations of neutron-rich and medium-mass nuclei. The method is efficient for nuclei with product-state references, and it describes many aspects of weakly bound and unbound nuclei. This report reviews the technical and conceptual developments of this method in nuclear physics, and the results of coupled-cluster calculations for nucleonic matter, and for exotic isotopes of helium, oxygen, calcium, and some of their neighbors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Kowalski, K., & Piecuch, P. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481769 · Cited by 440 · cited 1×
“The “completely renormalized” non-iterative triples corrections (Kowalski and Piecuch, 2000; Piecuch et al., 2002) are more sophisticated than the Λ-CCSD(T) approximation (but also computationally somewhat more expensive).”
BackgroundTwist-averaged boundary conditions in continuum quantum Monte Carlo algorithms
Lin, C., Zong, F. H., & Ceperley, D. M. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016702 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review
Engel, J., & Menéndez, J. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5 · Cited by 533
Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus
Dumitrescu, E. F., McCaskey, A. J., Hagen, G., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Papenbrock, T., Pooser, R. C., Dean, D. J., & Lougovski, P. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.210501 · Cited by 393
Self-citationUnexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes
Garcia Ruiz, R. F., Bissell, M. L., Blaum, K., Ekström, A., Frömmgen, N., Hagen, G., Hammen, M., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3645 · Cited by 367
Self-citationDiscrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 · Cited by 348
Self-citationA Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Hjorth-Jensen, M., & Dean, D. J.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-09-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 096302
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W1977993692
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302
- The paper
- Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Hjorth-Jensen, M., & Dean, D. J. (2014). Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
