Cited by 1,151Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER

Open access
Howard, Andrew W., Marcy, Geoffrey W., Bryson, Stephen T., Jenkins, Jon M., Rowe, Jason F., Batalha, Natalie M., Borucki, William J., Koch, David G. +59 more·2012·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We report the distribution of planets as a function of planet radius, orbital period, and stellar effective temperature for orbital periods less than 50 days around solar-type (GK) stars. These results are based on the 1235 planets (formally "planet candidates") from the Kepler mission that include a nearly complete set of detected planets as small as 2 R ⊕ . For each of the 156,000 target stars, we assess the detectability of planets as a function of planet radius, R p , and orbital period, P , using a measure of the detection efficiency for each star. We also correct for the geometric probability of transit, R ⋆ / a . We consider first Kepler target stars within the "solar subset" having T eff = 4100–6100 K, log g = 4.0–4.9, and Kepler magnitude Kp < 15 mag, i.e., bright, main-sequence GK stars. We include only those stars having photometric noise low enough to permit detection of planets down to 2 R ⊕ . We count planets in small domains of R p and P and divide by the included target stars to calculate planet occurrence in each domain. The resulting occurrence of planets varies by more than three orders of magnitude in the radius–orbital period plane and increases substantially down to the smallest radius (2 R ⊕ ) and out to the longest orbital period (50 days, ∼0.25 AU) in our study. For P < 50 days, the distribution of planet radii is given by a power law, df / d log R = k R R α with k R = 2.9 +0.5 − 0.4 , α = −1.92 ± 0.11, and R ≡ R p / R ⊕ . This rapid increase in planet occurrence with decreasing planet size agrees with the prediction of core-accretion formation but disagrees with population synthesis models that predict a desert at super-Earth and Neptune sizes for close-in orbits. Planets with orbital periods shorter than 2 days are extremely rare; for R p > 2 R ⊕ we measure an occurrence of less than 0.001 planets per star. For all planets with orbital periods less than 50 days, we measure occurrence of 0.130 ± 0.008, 0.023 ± 0.003, and 0.013 ± 0.002 planets per star for planets with radii 2–4, 4–8, and 8–32 R ⊕ , in agreement with Doppler surveys. We fit occurrence as a function of P to a power-law model with an exponential cutoff below a critical period P 0 . For smaller planets, P 0 has larger values, suggesting that the "parking distance" for migrating planets moves outward with decreasing planet size. We also measured planet occurrence over a broader stellar T eff range of 3600–7100 K, spanning M0 to F2 dwarfs. Over this range, the occurrence of 2–4 R ⊕ planets in the Kepler field increases with decreasing T eff , with these small planets being seven times more abundant around cool stars (3600–4100 K) than the hottest stars in our sample (6600–7100 K).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/15

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once observational biases are taken into account, super-Earth planets are among the most common planet size based on detections thus far.

    “Once observational biases are taken into account, super-Earth planets are among the most common planet size based on detections thus far (Howard et al., 2012; Mullally et al., 2015).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Howard et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, T. N., Van Cleve, J., Cochran, W. D., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Torres, G., Brown, T. M., Gilliland, R. L., Buchhave, L. A., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Ciardi, D., Fressin, F., Haas, M. R., Howell, S. B., Kjeldsen, H., Seager, S., Rogers, L., Sasselov, D. D., Steffen, J. H., Basri, G. S., Charbonneau, D., Christiansen, J., Clarke, B., Dupree, A., Fabrycky, D. C., Fischer, D. A., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Tarter, J., Girouard, F. R., Holman, M. J., Johnson, J. A., Klaus, T. C., Machalek, P., Moorhead, A. V., Morehead, R. C., Ragozzine, D., Tenenbaum, P., Twicken, J. D., Quinn, S. N., Isaacson, H., Shporer, A., Lucas, P. W., Walkowicz, L. M., Welsh, W. F., Boss, A., Devore, E., Gould, A., Smith, J. C., Morris, R. L., Prsa, A., Morton, T. D., Still, M., Thompson, S. E., Mullally, F., Endl, M., & MacQueen, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • Lowell Observatory (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network (US)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
Corresponding author
  • Howard, Andrew W.
  • Isaacson, Howard
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2012-06-25
Volume
201
Issue
2
Pages
15
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2083250837
Cited by
1,151
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 43
FWCI
59.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX06AH52G)
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Science Mission Directorate
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
planet occurrence, solar-type stars, Kepler mission, close-in planets, planet radius distribution, orbital period distribution, transit probability, super-Earths, Earth-like planets, hot Jupiters, exoplanet population, stellar effective temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review