Cited by 1,042Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchHistory and Developments in Astronomy

PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER . III. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 16 MONTHS OF DATA

Open access
Batalha, Natalie M., Rowe, Jason F., Bryson, Stephen T., Barclay, Thomas, Burke, Christopher J., Caldwell, Douglas A., Christiansen, Jessie L., Mullally, Fergal +68 more·2013·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

New transiting planet candidates are identified in 16 months (2009 May-2010 September) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly 5000 periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1108 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis that identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T 0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (R P/R sstarf), reduced semimajor axis (d/R sstarf), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (201% for candidates smaller than 2 R ⊕ compared to 53% for candidates larger than 2 R ⊕) and those at longer orbital periods (124% for candidates outside of 50 day orbits versus 86% for candidates inside of 50 day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from 13 months (Quarters 1-5) to 16 months (Quarters 1-6) even in regions of parameter space where one would have expected the previous catalogs to be complete. Analyses of planet frequencies based on previous catalogs will be affected by such incompleteness. The fraction of all planet candidate host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the habitable zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent surveys have demonstrated that m 5-10 M planets are exceedingly common around solar-type stars, and likely represent one of the dominant outcomes of the planet conglomeration process.

    “Recent photometric and spectroscopic surveys of planets around other stars (Borucki et al., 2010; Batalha et al., 2013), however, have conclusively demonstrated that m 5 10 M planets are exceedingly common around solar-type stars, and likely represent one of the dominant outcomes of the planet conglomeration process 20 .”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Batalha et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., Dupree, A. K., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Gilliland, R. L., Isaacson, H., Latham, D. W., Marcy, G. W., Quinn, S. N., Ragozzine, D., Shporer, A., Borucki, W. J., Ciardi, D. R., Gautier, T. N., Haas, M. R., Jenkins, J. M., Koch, D. G., Lissauer, J. J., Rapin, W., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Buchhave, L. A., Carter, J. A., Charbonneau, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Clarke, B. D., Cochran, W. D., Demory, B.-O., Desert, J.-M., Devore, E., Doyle, L. R., Esquerdo, G. A., Everett, M., Fressin, F., Geary, J. C., Girouard, F. R., Gould, A., Hall, J. R., Holman, M. J., Howard, A. W., Howell, S. B., Ibrahim, K. A., Kinemuchi, K., Kjeldsen, H., Klaus, T. C., Li, J., Lucas, P. W., Meibom, S., Morris, R. L., Prša, A., Quintana, E., Sanderfer, D. T., Sasselov, D., Seader, S. E., Smith, J. C., Steffen, J. H., Still, M., Stumpe, M. C., Tarter, J. C., Tenenbaum, P., Torres, G., Twicken, J. D., Uddin, K., Van Cleve, J., Walkowicz, L., & Welsh, W. F.
Affiliations
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • McDonald Observatory (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • Villanova University (US)
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Batalha, Natalie M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2013-02-05
Volume
204
Issue
2
Pages
24
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2947592794
Cited by
1,042
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 165 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 29
FWCI
98.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX08AR04G)
  • Science Mission Directorate
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/J001333/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
exoplanet candidates, Kepler mission, transit detection, eclipsing binaries, image subtraction, impact parameter, orbital period, planet frequency, multi-planet systems, Earth-sized planets, habitable zone, light curve modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review