Cited by 90Relativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

The energy-momentum tensor of a black hole, or what curves the Schwarzschild geometry?

Open access
Balasin, H, Nachbagauer, H·1993·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Using distributional techniques we calculate the energy-momentum tensor of the Schwarzschild geometry. It turns out to be a well defined tensor distribution concentrated on the r=0 region which is usually excluded from spacetime. This provides a physical interpretation for the curvature of this geometry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/10/11/010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Oppenheimer-Snyder model of gravitational collapse does not smoothly lead to the Schwarzschild black hole because its energy-momentum tensor is dust of the contracting FLRW Universe and thus a perfect fluid.

    “This suggests that the model of the gravitational collapse proposed by Oppenheimer-Snyder[27] does not smoothly lead to the Schwarzschild BH, since their EMT is the dust of the contracting FLRW Universe and thus the perfect fluid.”

    From Is energy conserved in general relativity? (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

  • For a static point-like quantum system of mass m, its gravitational field is described by the Schwarzschild metric, and the prescription of [42] yields dim H_G = e^{4π(m/m_Pl)^2}, in coherence with (4.7).

    “It is instructive to analyse a static point-like quantum system of mass m.Its gravitational field is then described by the Schwarzschild metric [75], hence the prescription of [42] yields the formula dim H G = e 4π(m/m Pl ) 2 , in coherence with (4.7).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balasin, H., & Nachbagauer, H.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1993-11-01
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
2271-2278
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2087477702
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
energy-momentum tensor, Schwarzschild geometry, black holes, distributional methods, spacetime curvature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review