Cited by 14Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Graviton production as a measure of gravitational entropy in an isotropic universe

Open access
Nesteruk, Alexei V, Ottewill, Adrian C·1995·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The number of gravitons produced within the particle horizon of an isotropic universe describes the capacity of the gravitational field to create matter and is associated with the gravitational entropy. A geometrical expression for gravitational entropy in an isotropic universe is justified in this approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/12/1/005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the FLRW universe, the increase of matter entropy from graviton production is accompanied by a decrease of gravitational entropy.

    “One can see that the increase of matter entropy from the production process is accompanied by a decrease of gravitational entropy. This is discussed in [91,92].”

    From Weyl Curvature Hypothesis in Light of Quantum Backreaction at Cosmological Singularities or Bounces (2021) · cites this paper as [91]

    Section 3 (‘Number density of gravitons produced’; page unavailable) says that, at late times, the paper’s gravitational-entropy measure can be set equal to the matter entropy of accumulated gravitons. The Discussion (section 5; page unavailable) likewise says the two expressions coincide, rather than describing an increase in matter entropy accompanied by a decrease in gravitational entropy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Penrose R 1979 General Re1ntivi.y: An Einstein Centenary Surveyed S W Hawking and W lsnel (Cambridge:
  2. [2]2. Penrose R 1981 Quamum Graviiy 2 ed C J Isham. R Penrose and D W Sciama (Oxford: Oxford University 131
  3. [9]9. Nesteruk A V 1992 Ann Fond. de Broglie 17 175 Cambridge University Press) Press) Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nesteruk, A. V., & Ottewill, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2054829662
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
Funders
Royal Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
graviton production, gravitational entropy, isotropic universe, particle horizon, gravity field, matter creation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review