Cited by 8Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

Comment on `An extreme critical spacetime: echoing and black-hole perturbations'

Open access
Clément, Gérard, Hayward, Sean A·2001·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We show that the black hole perturbations of the Hayward static solution to the massless Einstein-Klein-Gordon equations are actually gauge artifacts resulting from the linearization of a coordinate transformation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/18/21/401

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ω_B modes are spurious, artifacts arising from the linearization of a coordinate transformation, and only the ω_A modes correspond to physical perturbations.

    “However, it was later clarified in [287] that the ω B modes are spurious, artifacts arising from the linearization of a coordinate transformation, and only the ω A modes correspond to physical perturbations.”

    From Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse (2026) · cites this paper as [287]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. S.A. Hayward, Class. Quantum Grav. 17, 4021 (2000)
  2. A.V. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6433 (1997)
  3. M.D. Roberts, Gen. Rel. Grav. 21, 907 (1989);
  4. P.R. Brady, Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 1255 (1994);
  5. Y. Oshiro, K. Nakamura and A. Tomi- matsu, Progr. Theor. Phys. 91, 1265 (1994)
  6. M.W. Choptuik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 9 (1993)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clément, G., & Hayward, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2001-10-25
Volume
18
Issue
21
Pages
4715-4716
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2154753984
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
black hole perturbations, Einstein-Klein-Gordon equations, massless scalar field, coordinate transformation, linearization, extremal black holes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review