Cited by 228Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Quantum symmetry, the cosmological constant and Planck-scale phenomenology

Open access
Amelino-Camelia, Giovanni, Smolin, Lee, Starodubtsev, Artem·2004·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We present a simple algebraic mechanism for the emergence of deformations of Poincaré symmetries in the low-energy limit of quantum theories of gravity. The deformations, called κ-Poincaré algebras, are parametrized by a dimensional parameter proportional to the Planck mass, and imply modified energy–momentum relations of a type that may be observable in near future experiments. Our analysis assumes that the low energy limit of a quantum theory of gravity must also involve a limit in which the cosmological constant is taken very small with respect to the Planck scale, and makes use of the fact that in some quantum theories of gravity the cosmological constant results in the (anti)de Sitter symmetry algebra being quantum deformed. We show that deformed Poincaré symmetries inevitably emerge in the small-cosmological-constant limit of quantum gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions, where geometry does not have local degrees of freedom. In 3 + 1 dimensions we observe that, besides the quantum deformation of the (anti)de Sitter symmetry algebra, one must also take into account that there are local degrees of freedom leading to a renormalization of the generators for energy and momentum of the excitations. At the present level of development of quantum gravity in 3 + 1 dimensions, it is not yet possible to derive this renormalization from first principles, but we establish the conditions needed for the emergence of a deformed low energy limit symmetry algebra also in the case of 3 + 1 dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/21/13/002

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • (2+1)-dimensional gravity automatically displays a deformation of the Poincaré algebra associated with doubly special relativity.

    “It has recently been pointed out that (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity automatically displays such a deformation [197, 18, 126].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Amelino-Camelia G 2000 Are we at the dawn of quantum-gravity phenomenology? Lecture Notes in Physics vol 541 p 1 (Preprint gr-qc/991089)
  2. Mavromatos N E 2000 Preprint gr-qc/0009045 · arXiv
  3. Sarkar S 2002 Possible astrophysical probes of quantum gravity Preprint gr-qc/0204092 · arXiv
  4. Ahluwalia D V 2002 Interface of gravitational and quantum realms Preprint gr-qc/0205121 · arXiv
  5. Konopka T J and Major S A 2002 Observational limits on quantum geometry effects New J. Phys. 4 57 (Preprint hep-ph/0201184) · arXiv
  6. Myers R C and Pospelov M 2003 Ultraviolet modifications of dispersion relations in effective field theory Preprint hep-ph/0301124 · arXiv
  7. Brandenberger R H and Martin J 2002 On signatures of short distance physics in the cosmic microwave background Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17 3663 (Preprint hep-th/0202142) · arXiv
  8. Amelino-Camelia G 2002 Relativity in spacetimes with short-distance structure governed by an observer- independent (Planckian) length scale Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 35 (Preprint gr-qc/0012051) · arXiv
  9. Amelino-Camelia G 2001 Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length Phys. Lett. B 510 255 (Preprint hep-th/0012238) · arXiv
  10. Kowalski-Glikman J 2001 Observer independent quantum of mass Phys. Lett. A 286 391 (Preprint hep- th/0102098)
  11. Bruno N R, Amelino-Camelia G and Kowalski-Glikman J 2001 Deformed boost transformations that saturate at the Planck length Phys. Lett. B 522 133 (Preprint hep-th/0107039) · arXiv
  12. Judes S and Visser M 2002 Conservation laws in doubly special relativity Preprint gr-qc/0205067 · arXiv
  13. Kowalski-Glikman J and Nowak S 2003 Noncommutative spacetime of doubly special relativity theories Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12 299 (Preprint hep-th/0204245) · arXiv
  14. Magueijo J and Smolin L 2003 Gravity's rainbow Preprint gr-qc/0305055 · arXiv
  15. Amelino-Camelia G 2002 Doubly special relativity Nature 418 34 (Preprint gr-qc/0207049) · arXiv
  16. Amelino-Camelia G 2002 Doubly special relativity: first results and key open problems Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 1643 (Preprint gr-qc/0210063) · arXiv
  17. Kimberly D, Magueijo J and Medeiros J 2003 Non-linear relativity in position space Preprint gr-qc/0303067 · arXiv
  18. Gambini R and Pullin J 1999 Nonstandard optics from quantum spacetime Phys. Rev. D 59 124021 (Preprint gr-qc/9809038) · arXiv
  19. Alfaro J, Morales-Tecotl H A and Urrutia L F 2002 Loop quantum gravity and light propagation Phys. Rev. D 65 103509 (Preprint hep-th/0108061) · arXiv
  20. Alfaro J, Morales-Tecotl H A and Urrutia L F 2000 Quantum gravity corrections to neutrino propagation Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2318 (Preprint gr-qc/9909079) · arXiv
  21. Amelino-Camelia G, Ellis J, Mavromatos N E, Nanopoulos D V and Sarkar S 1998 Nature 393 763 (Preprint astro-ph/9712103) · arXiv
  22. Smolin L 2002 Quantum gravity with a positive cosmological constant Preprint hep-th/0209079 · arXiv
  23. Ambjorn J, Dasgupta A, Jurkiewiczcy J and Loll R A 2002 Lorentzian cure for Euclidean troubles Preprint hep-th/0201104 · arXiv
  24. Ambjorn J and Loll R 1998 Non-perturbative Lorentzian quantum gravity, causality and topology change Nucl. Phys. B 536 407 (Preprint hep-th/9805108) · arXiv
  25. Smolin L and Soo Chopin 1995 The Chern-Simons invariant as the natural time variable for classical and quantum cosmology Nucl. Phys. B 449 289 (Preprint gr-qc/9405015) · arXiv
  26. Buffenoir E, Noui K and Roche P 2002 Hamiltonian quantization of Chern-Simons theory with SL(2, C) group Class. Quantum Grav. 19 4953 (Preprint hep-th/0202121) · arXiv
  27. Smolin L 1995 Linking topological quantum field theory and nonperturbative quantum gravity J. Math. Phys. 36 6417 (Preprint gr-qc/9505028) · arXiv
  28. Major S and Smolin L 1996 Quantum deformation of quantum gravity Nucl. Phys. B 473 267 (Preprint gr-qc/9512020) · arXiv
  29. Starodubtsev A 2003 Topological excitations around the vacuum of quantum gravity: I. The symmetries of the vacuum Preprint hep-th/0306135 · arXiv
  30. Carlip S 1998 Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  31. Inonu E and Wigner E P 1953 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 39 510
  32. Majid S and Ruegg H 1994 Phys. Lett. B 334 348 (Preprint hep-th/9405107) · arXiv
  33. Ezawa K 1996 Ashtekar's formulation for N = 1, 2 supergravities as 'constrained' BF theories Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 863 (Preprint hep-th/9511047) · arXiv
  34. Noui K and Roche P 2002 Cosmological deformation of Lorentzian spin foam models Preprint gr-qc/0211109 · arXiv
  35. Smolin L 2000 A holographic formulation of quantum general relativity Phys. Rev. D 61 084007 (Preprint hep-th/9808191) · arXiv
  36. Ling Y and Smolin L 2001 Holographic formulation of quantum supergravity Phys. Rev. D 63 064010 (Preprint hep-th/0009018) · arXiv
  37. Crane L and Yetter D N 2003 Measurable categories and 2-groups Preprint math.QA/0305176 · arXiv
  38. Fock V V and Rosly A A 1999 Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 191 67 (Preprint math.QA/9802054) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amelino-Camelia, G., Smolin, L., & Starodubtsev, A.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2004-06-04
Volume
21
Issue
13
Pages
3095-3110
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2089199943
Cited by
228
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
κ-Poincaré algebra, quantum gravity, cosmological constant, Planck scale, 2+1 dimensions, four-dimensional spacetime, low-energy limit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review