CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fundamental limitations on ‘warp drive’ spacetimes

Open access
Lobo, Francisco S N, Visser, Matt·2004·Classical and Quantum Gravity
DOI 10.1088/0264-9381/21/24/011
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

'Warp drive' spacetimes are useful as 'gedanken-experiments' that force us to confront the foundations of general relativity, and among other things, to precisely formulate the notion of 'superluminal' communication. After carefully formulating the Alcubierre and Natário warp drive spacetimes, and verifying their non-perturbative violation of the classical energy conditions, we consider a more modest question and apply linearized gravity to the weak-field warp drive, testing the energy conditions to first and second orders of the warp-bubble velocity, v . Since we take the warp-bubble velocity to be non-relativistic, v ≪ c , we are not primarily interested in the 'superluminal' features of the warp drive. Instead we focus on a secondary feature of the warp drive that has not previously been remarked upon—the warp drive (if it could be built) would be an example of a 'reaction-less drive'. For both the Alcubierre and Natário warp drives we find that the occurrence of significant energy condition violations is not just a high-speed effect, but that the violations persist even at arbitrarily low speeds. A particularly interesting feature of this construction is that it is now meaningful to think of placing a finite mass spaceship at the centre of the warp bubble, and then see how the energy in the warp field compares with the mass–energy of the spaceship. There is no hope of doing this in Alcubierre's original version of the warp field, since by definition the point at the centre of the warp bubble moves on a geodesic and is 'massless'. That is, in Alcubierre's original formalism and in the Natário formalism the spaceship is always treated as a test particle, while in the linearized theory we can treat the spaceship as a finite mass object. For both the Alcubierre and Natário warp drives we find that even at low speeds the net (negative) energy stored in the warp fields must be a significant fraction of the mass of the spaceship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/21/24/011

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Visser M, 1999, Proc. 8th Canadian Conf. on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics
  2. Misner C W, 1973, Gravitation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lobo, F. S. N., & Visser, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
ORCID
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2004-11-26
Volume
21
Issue
24
Pages
5871-5892
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
DOI
10.1088/0264-9381/21/24/011
OpenAlex
W2077412049
Cited by
117
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Royal Society Te Apārangi
  • Marsden Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
warp drive, Alcubierre metric, energy conditions, superluminal communication, linearized gravity, weak-field limit, warp bubble, negative energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review